Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search. There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Displaying 438 questions Show Answers

Order by |

Question reference: S5W-13869

Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Monday, 15 January 2018
Current Status: Answered by Michael Matheson on 23 January 2018

To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on setting up and maintaining a national register of people who have been falsely accused of rape.

Question reference: S5W-13852

Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Monday, 15 January 2018
Current Status: Answered by Keith Brown on 23 January 2018

To ask the Scottish Government what information it has regarding what projects are likely to feature in the Stirling and Clackmannanshire City Deal.

The Scottish Government remains fully committed to a City Region Deal for Stirling and Clackmannanshire and we have been leading tripartite discussions with the city region partners and the UK Government throughout the process. It is crucial for us that this Deal delivers the best possible outcomes for Stirling and Clackmannanshire and delivers transformative growth to the regional economy and inclusion. Any plan must fit within the overall framework of Scotland’s Economic Strategy – making a clear and measurable significant long-term contribution to both prosperity and fairness.

The scale of the Deal, and the projects included within it, will be subject to negotiation between both the Scottish and UK Governments and the city region partners. Given the nature of these discussions it is not possible, at this stage, for me to confirm when a decision will be reached or to discuss details of which projects may be included as part of the overall deal going forward.

We are giving all proposals our full consideration and, depending on the progress made through tripartite discussions, we are working to reach a Heads of Terms agreement as soon as possible.

Question reference: S5W-13302

Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 December 2017
Current Status: Answered by Humza Yousaf on 22 December 2017

To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on care homes being permitted to issue day disability badges, similar to those offered to rail passengers.

We recognise the vital role the disabled person’s parking scheme plays in supporting people to live independent lives. For example, I have this week announced the extension of the scheme to some people with cognitive impairments who pose a risk to themselves or others in traffic, where alternative strategies do not work to handle the risk.

At present care homes can pay for a range of rail tickets to facilitate travel of their residents, full details of which are available on the ScotRail website.

There is a facility to issue disabled person’s parking badges to organisations such as care homes, when the organisation is carrying passengers who would be entitled in their own right to such a badge. Individual decisions about issue of such badges is a matter for the local authority.

More information about our position on eligibility criteria for a disabled person’s parking badge is available at www.mygov.scot/apply-blue-badge/eligibility-who-can-have-one which has a full description of eligibility criteria.

Question reference: S5F-01853

Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Monday, 18 December 2017
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 21 December 2017

To ask the First Minister what the Scottish Government's response is to figures from NSPCC Scotland, which suggest that there has been a 42% increase in child sexual abuse referrals in the last year.

Question reference: S5O-01607

Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 13 December 2017
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 21 December 2017

To ask the Scottish Government how it ensures that multidisciplinary goal setting is in place for stroke patients as soon as possible as part of their rehabilitation.

Question reference: S5W-13134

Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Monday, 04 December 2017
Current Status: Answered by Humza Yousaf on 13 December 2017

To ask the Scottish Government what its position on whether the 40mph "buffer zone" on Doune Road in Dunblane should be reviewed, in light of its proximity to the Grant Drive/Wallace Road crossing, which is used by school children to cross.

The road to which this PQ refers is a local road and, therefore, under the jurisdiction of its relevant Local Authority - in this case Stirling Council. Local Authorities have a statutory duty to promote road safety and take steps to both reduce and prevent accidents. In this respect it is for the Council to consider appropriate measures which will safeguard road users and residents, and to determine the priority that should be given to any road safety measures. It is not for Scottish Ministers to intervene in a Local Authority’s day-to-day performance of these particular duties.

Question reference: S5W-13123

Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Monday, 04 December 2017
Current Status: Answered by Humza Yousaf on 13 December 2017

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-11613 by Humza Yousaf on 16 October 2017, in light of it not being able to define timescales for any GRIP4 work, what assurances it can provide that the Levenmouth rail reinstatement is on course.

Transport investment decisions have to be supported by robust evidence. That is why I have instructed Transport Scotland to progress the transport appraisal work undertaken to date for the Levenmouth Sustainable Transport Study, in line with STAG, and in close collaboration with Fife Council. The transport appraisal work will determine if there is a rationale for progressing the Levenmouth rail link, which will be one of the options considered in the Levenmouth Sustainable Transport Study.

Question reference: S5W-13133

Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Monday, 04 December 2017
Current Status: Answered by Humza Yousaf on 13 December 2017

To ask the Scottish Government for what reason a number of commuter parking spaces were removed from around Dunblane railway station as part of a recent Sustrans project, and whether it will provide support to have these reinstated.

Question reference: S5W-12996

Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Monday, 27 November 2017
Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 12 December 2017

To ask the Scottish Government, regarding maintaining a national stroke registry, guideline and standard development and performance management and reporting, whether its stroke strategy is inclusive of all types of strokes and, in particular, (a) subarachnoid haemorrhages and (b) strokes in children, and how many occurrences of each of these there have been in the last year.

Through our Stroke Improvement Plan (2014) we are committed to ensuring that people who have had a stroke of whatever type have this identified as quickly as possible and receive access to the best possible care.

While there is no national stroke registry, the Scottish Stroke Care Audit (SSCA) covers all admitted adult stroke patients, including those with ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage not due to trauma (sometimes referred to as non-traumatic or primary intracerebral haemorrhage).

A subarachnoid haemorrhage is an uncommon type of haemorrhage stroke caused by bleeding on the surface of the brain (such as from an aneurysm or less commonly from an arteriovenous malformation). Once identified, patients are cared for within neurosurgery and are not included in the SSCA because they have very different clinical presentations from the remainder of stroke patients. Similarly, the SSCA does not include childhood stroke, i.e. stroke among those aged under 16, because they are treated using a different pathway. We would expect clinicians to be aware of the latest professional evidence-based guidance regarding care of children including the Royal College of Paediatrics and Childhood Health's 'Stroke in Childhood' clinical guideline (2017). Healthcare Improvement Scotland include, as part of their neurological health service standards, treatment criteria for headache due to particular symptoms including subarachnoid haemorrhage; http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/long_term_conditions/neurological_health_services/neurological_standards_2009.asp

The table shows the number of hospital stays for subarachnoid haemorrhage and stroke in Scotland for the financial year 2015-16. These figures include 10 hospital stays with stroke among children aged 15 years or under. There were no hospital stays for subarachnoid haemorrhages in children aged 15 years or under in the same year.

Numbers of hospital stays, by diagnosis, for all types of admission, in Scotland, all persons, for the financial year 2015-16.

Diagnosis	Number of stays
Subarachnoid haemorrhages	570
Stroke	9441

Background Notes –

Subarachnoid haemorrhage ICD-10 : I60; Stroke ICD-10: I61,I63,I64
An individual patient may have more than one stay in hospital for the same condition within this period.

Question reference: S5W-12997

Asked by: Alexander Stewart, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Date lodged: Monday, 27 November 2017
Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 12 December 2017

To ask the Scottish Government how many patients (a) were thrombolysed and (b) could have been eligible for thrombolysis on presentation at hospital following a stroke in 2016, broken down by NHS board.

The Scottish Government’s Stroke Improvement Plan, published in 2014, reaffirms stroke as a clinical priority for the NHS in Scotland. The Plan outlines eight key priorities and actions to improve stroke treatment and care in Scotland. NHS Boards report on progress in the implementation of the Improvement Plan priorities, and this is presented in the Scottish Stroke Improvement Programme (SSIP) Report.

The SSIP report, published on 11 July 2017, indicates the number of patients receiving thrombolysis in 2016, broken down by Board on pages 39-40. The report is available at: http://www.strokeaudit.scot.nhs.uk/index.html.

The information requested for patients who could have been eligible for thrombolysis is not available centrally.