- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 10 September 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 11 November 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to allow a person's COVID-19 vaccination status to be recorded as fully vaccinated if they have received two doses of different vaccines; whether it will allow such people to be exempt from the 10-day quarantine period when returning to Scotland from green and amber list countries, similar to people who have received two doses of the same vaccine, and whether any exemptions on this issue will be made for Armed Forces personnel and their families.
Answer
Scottish Government is working on delivering a solution at pace for individuals whom have received 2 doses of differing approved vaccines. Clinicians are fully sighted and conversant with recommendations.
From 4 October, fully vaccinated travellers who have received mixed doses of authorised vaccines under the International Travel Regime across the four nations and are returning from non-Red list countries will not be required to self-isolate for 10 days. This is consistent with the approach taken across the UK.
There are many nuanced circumstances regarding how and where vaccinations can be delivered, particularly with international travel and military deployment. We will be updating guidance via NHS Inform and a FAQ to advise that UK vaccines administered abroad to MOD personnel and other UK national stationed abroad will be treated in the same way as those administered elsewhere the UK.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 October 2021
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 10 November 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment was made of deer-browsing damage in all state forests prior to a licence being given to Forestry and Land Scotland to cull them out-of-season; what its response is to reports that data seen by the Scottish Gamekeepers Association suggests a cull grid reference location to be outside of state forestry, and what its position is on whether out-of-season licences should be used on the open hill and not in state forestry boundaries.
Answer
FLS takes an evidence-led approach to its deer management activities. On the National Forests and Land (NFL), FLS has a target of not incurring more than 10% deer damage to young trees. In 2020 the 3 year rolling average of deer damage impacts was 18% for the leaders on young trees, i.e. trees planted for 1 year in the ground. This is well above the FLS target. The regional variation for damage impacts ranged from 7% to 38% in 2020. Results at site level in 2020 ranged from 0% to 100% damage of young trees.
Along with monitoring deer impacts on biodiversity, FLS also monitors deer populations (densities). Over the past 5 years approximately one third of NFL have been surveyed as part of a rolling programme. The mean average deer density in these survey areas have ranged from 4.2 deer per km2 to 64.7 deer per km2. The FLS target range as published in the FLS deer management strategy in 2014 is between 2 and 7 deer per km2. Of the land surveyed in the last five years, 89% has deer density well above this widely accepted.
FLS works in partnership with neighbouring land managers with similar management objectives and FLS operatives therefore do, in specific locations or project areas carry out collaborative deer management operations on neighbouring ground. FLS data will therefore reflect this. Occasionally an FLS operative may make a simple numerical error when inputting a grid reference into the Wildlife Management System.
FLS takes an holistic approach to its management of land, forests and deer on NFL. It manages around 630,000 ha of land (9% of Scotland), of which approximately one third is open ground including open hill. Its aim is to protect a wide range of habitats and environments across NFL whether forested, riparian or open hill in order to deliver Scottish Government land-use priorities such as climate change mitigation, carbon capture through growing trees, peatland restoration, ecosystem services and biodiversity enhancement, all of which have added immediacy, impetus and focus to our deer management operation. FLS therefore has a very clear need to use Out of Season authorisations on the open hill as well as in forest and woodland areas. FLS always aims to achieve the highest standards of animal welfare when undertaking all deer culling operations, in line with best industry practice; i.e. when culling adult female deer prior to the start of the official open season all efforts should be made to cull associated juveniles first, if in any doubt about leaving a dependant young then the adult should not be culled.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 30 August 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 8 November 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether any ring-fenced funds are being provided to local authorities to cover the cost of installing (a) ventilation aids, such as fans, and (b) CO2 monitors in all public buildings, including schools and community groups.
Answer
The Scottish Government provided Scotland’s local authorities with an additional £1.2 billion in direct support during 2020-21 through the local government finance settlement – over and above their regular grant payments to combat COVID-19. Taken together with the additional £259 million confirmed for this year, this brings the value of the overall COVID-19 support package for councils up to over £1.5 billion.
£10 million of funding was announced on 3 August to enable local authorities to undertake CO2 monitoring to assess the ventilation levels in all learning, teaching and play spaces by the October break.
Further to initial recommendations from the Short Life Working Group on Ventilation, funding of up to £25million to support businesses with ventilation was announced on 28 September. Due to be open for applications in November, further details will be available in due course.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 October 2021
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 3 November 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what records Forestry and Land Scotland kept in 2020 to ensure that mothers killed were matched to calves killed; how it ensured that all alternatives were tried first in every forest, in keeping with the conditions for an out-of-season culling licence for deer; what information it has on whether this approach was taken prior to the out-of-season dear cull in September 2021, and what its position is on whether such licences are needed in all national forests.
Answer
All data collected associated with deer culled on National Forests and Land (NFL) is recorded in FLS Wildlife Management System (WMS) database. The following table is derived from this database. This is managed by robust supervision of cullers and checks to match the juvenile GPS data to the adult female GPS data; however there are many factors that may influence the ratio demonstrated in the following below.
| Species | No. of Adult Females | No. of Juveniles | Ratio |
Sept 2020 | Red Hinds | 287 | 210 | 0.73 |
Sept 2020 | Roe does | 327 | 239 | 0.73 |
Sept 2020 | Sika Hinds | 116 | 107 | 0.9 |
Survey data showing current high background levels of resident and inwardly migrating deer across NFL coupled with associated damage level data requires FLS to reduce deer numbers/densities at local and landscape-scale across NFL.
The FLS approach to reduced deer fencing, increased culling and the use of Out of Season shooting has been developed over many years of professional and large-scale management of all four species of deer, across a very wide range of terrains and habitats across Scotland. This has been an iterative process, where alternatives have in the past been considered and tested and informed by the continuous gathering of data from a number of rolling survey programmes such as deer damage impact assessments.
The scale of Scotland’s national forests and land means that FLS takes a pragmatic and cost effective approach to deer management to deliver multiple public benefits and sustainable land management.
FLS’s comprehensive deer management database WMS and new ARCGIS dashboard (in development), records a very large volume of information relevant to how FLS assesses the need for culling and the need for Out of Season authorisations. This includes deer damage impact levels, deer density levels (including on neighbouring ground where available), and an extensive history of the exact location of culling and relevant biometrics for each deer shot on NFL.
Wild deer are mobile, can travel considerable distances and need to feed 365 days of the year, day and night, and FLS therefore has to utilise all available, legal and approved means in order to protect its tree crops and other natural assets throughout all twelve months of the year. This includes using Out of season, Night Shooting and thermal imaging equipment.
FLS’s Out of Season culling operation necessarily covers the whole estate. Without the ongoing, diligent application of Out of Season authorisations, the resultant deer damage impacts would quickly build-up and prevent FLS from delivering many of its management objectives across NFL.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 September 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 27 October 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, what its response is to ATM providers reportedly being charged a higher level of business rates by local authorities for operating so-called through-the-wall machines, and, in light of the 2020 Supreme Court ruling for England and Wales, which said that no additional business rates could be charged on ATMs for having them onsite, what measures it is taking to support ATM providers in Scotland facing such business rates.
Answer
The valuation of all non-domestic property is a matter for the independent assessors, who follow applicable statute and case law in making their decisions on non-domestic property valuations. The 2020 Supreme Court ruling for England and Wales is not binding in Scots law, although I am aware that dialogue is ongoing between assessors and agents regarding the rating of ATM sites following that decision.
The Scottish Government provides the most generous non-domestic rates regime in the UK, and in 2021-22 delivered an unprecedented reduction in the poundage mid-revaluation; returning it to pre-COVID levels, which saves Scottish Businesses over £120 million compared with a standard inflationary increase.
The Scottish Government have continued to ensure that the sites of standalone ATMs in rural areas are exempt from rating. Other ATMs may benefit from as much as a 100% rates relief through the Small Business Bonus Scheme.
Under the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, each local Council has wide-raging powers to create rates reliefs to reflect local needs. This may apply to a sole business, sector or area. The relief may be an adaptation of an existing national relief scheme or a unique standalone scheme.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 05 October 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kate Forbes on 27 October 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to its announcement of £25 million of funding for businesses to improve ventilation, whether funding will also be made available for community halls for public use.
Answer
We are taking forward a number of recommendations made by the Short Life Working Group on Ventilation in order to improve airflow in settings where transmission of Covid-19 is most likely to occur. As the First Minister stated when she announced this £25 million package of funding, the support will focus on the hospitality and leisure sectors although the specific sectors and premises that will be eligible for financial support through this fund is still being determined and community halls are being actively considered as part of this process.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 October 2021
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 26 October 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what guarantees it can provide that dependent deer calves will be killed along with their mothers during Forestry and Land Scotland’s out-of-season deer culls.
Answer
Forestry and Land Scotland’s (FLS), deer culling operatives are qualified and trained, are registered ‘Fit and Competent’, have Deer Stalking Certificates 1&2 and hold ‘Trained Hunter’ status.
FLS’s culling activities are robustly supervised and monitored and all operatives are briefed that, if there is any possibility of orphaning a dependant calf that a shot must not be taken, all dependant calves must be culled before the mother.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 September 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 25 October 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether the Office of the Public Guardian in Scotland (OPG) is experiencing a backlog of power of attorney applications, and, if so, what support it is offering the OPG to ease this backlog.
Answer
Due to Covid-19, the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) have a backlog of Power of Attorney deeds awaiting registration. The Scottish Government has provided funding of £238,000 to the Office of the Public Guardian to fund the power of attorney Covid recovery plan.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 September 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 20 October 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to support the country’s grouse moors, and, in light of the recent report published by the University of Northampton, Sustainable Grouse Shooting?, which stated that “It is unlikely that the alternative uses [to grouse shooting] that are proposed by some groups for the moorlands would deliver the same positive economic impacts, at least for a number of generations”, what analysis it has carried out of the economic impact of these moors.
Answer
As we stated when we published our response to the independent Grouse Moor Management Group report (the ‘Werritty Review’) in November 2020 we recognise the important contribution grouse shooting makes to the rural economy.
Alongside the Werritty review, the Scottish Government commissioned Scotland’s Rural College and the James Hutton Institute to undertake extensive research into the biodiversity and economic Impacts of grouse moors to address some of the knowledge gaps regarding Scottish driven grouse moor management.
The research was carried out in two phases and the reports, which were published in 2019 and 2020 can found on the Scottish Government website at Socioeconomic and biodiversity impacts of driven grouse moors in Scotland | SEFARI
and
Phase 2 Grouse Research - Socioeconomic and biodiversity impacts of driven grouse moors and the employment rights of gamekeepers | SEFARI
The findings of this research, alongside other available evidence were taken into account when we developed our response to the Werritty review.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 September 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 20 October 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the recent report published by the University of Northampton, Sustainable Grouse Shooting?, which stated that “We believe that our conclusions, detailed above, are supported by the currently available evidence. However, we are conscious of the danger of legislation being driven by public (non-evidence based) perceptions of issues such as animal welfare, muirburn, rewilding etc. It is important that policy makers are presented with evidence, in a form that they find useful. This report will help in the production of this useful evidence”, and whether it will take the findings of the report into account when making decisions regarding how it supports grouse moor management.
Answer
We published our response to the recommendations of the Grouse Moor Management Group, an independent group tasked by the Scottish Government with assessing the environmental impact of grouse moor management, on 26 November 2020 – Grouse Moor Management Group recommendations: Scottish Government response - gov.scot (www.gov.scot) .
And as we set out in 2021 Programme for Government we will – ‘deliver the recommendations of the Grouse Moor Management Review Group as a matter of urgency, including the licensing of grouse moors. Licensing or further regulation will cover the key areas identified in the review, including muirburn, wildlife control, he use of medicated grit and wildlife crime.’
A full public and stakeholder consultation will be undertaken as part of this process.