- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 27 August 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 27 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of its previous commitment to dual the A96, whether this remains a commitment, and, if so, when work will begin on dualling the A96, and when the new road will be open.
Answer
We are not stepping away from our commitment to the north and north east of Scotland to improve A96 corridor. The current plan is to fully dual the A96 between Inverness and Aberdeen, however we have agreed to conduct a transparent, evidence-based review to include a climate compatibility assessment to assess direct and indirect impacts on the climate and the environment which will report by the end of 2022.
Delivery of any section of the programme can only commence if approved under the relevant statutory procedures and thereafter a timetable for progress can be set in line with available budgets.
- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 27 August 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 27 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it anticipates making design changes to the dualling of the A96, and, if so, what these will be.
Answer
The current plan is to fully dual the A96 route between Inverness and Aberdeen, however we have agreed to conduct a transparent, evidence-based review to include a climate compatibility assessment to assess direct and indirect impacts on the climate and the environment which will report by the end of 2022. We are still committed to improving the A96 and will take forward a transport enhancements programme that improves connectivity between surrounding towns, tackles congestion and addresses safety and environmental issues.
All projects, including the A96 Programme, are subject to detailed review and assessment work to ensure we deliver the right schemes and keep impacts on the environment to the absolute minimum.
- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 27 August 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 27 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what the timetable is for the individual elements of the A96 dualling project.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-02548 on 27 September 2021. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 27 August 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 27 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what the anticipated cost is of dualling the A96, and what funding mechanism will be used.
Answer
Details on the current estimated cost of each of the sections in preparation can be found in relevant scheme assessment reports published on the Transport Scotland website at https://www.transport.gov.scot/projects/a96-dualling-inverness-to-aberdeen/ .
Delivery of any section of the programme can only commence if approved under the relevant statutory procedures and thereafter a timetable and funding mechanism for progress can be set in line with available budgets.
- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 September 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 23 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-02202 by Graeme Dey on 7 September 2021, whether it will provide the information requested regarding whether the adoption of the sustainable investment hierarchy will have an impact on decisions to proceed with any of the road-building projects that it has previously committed to, and for what reason it did not provide this information in its response.
Answer
Further to the answer to S6W-02202, all of the trunk road projects currently progressing through the design or statutory processes and which were recommendations from first Strategic Transport Projects Review published in 2008, have been subject of consideration against the sustainable investment hierarchy as part of the appraisal process undertaken at that time.
As work on the trunk roads projects and programmes continues, they are subject to the statutory authorisation and business case processes, this includes revisiting the strategic case for investment at key decision points, which would encompass consideration of the sustainable investment hierarchy amongst other policies.
- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 September 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Patrick Harvie on 23 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, regarding the Spaces for People scheme, which temporary installations have been removed or reversed; which of the infrastructure is scheduled to be removed or reversed; how much it will cost to remove or reverse this infrastructure, and what the original cost was of each project.
Answer
Spaces for People (SfP) schemes are the responsibility of individual local authorities. It is therefore for local authorities to determine the length of time SfP measures should remain in place and to take decisions on their removal. Sustrans has provided support and advice to local authorities intending to make SfP infrastructure permanent.
The Spaces for People programme provided local authorities with funding to deliver temporary active travel infrastructure. As local authorities are fully responsible for the delivery of SfP measures, they hold information on installation and removal costs for individual interventions.
A total of £38.9 million was awarded to local authorities, Regional Transport Partnership (RTPs), the National Health Service (NHS) and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) via Spaces for People as set out in the following table:
Partners | Funding award |
Aberdeen City Council | £ 1,760,000 |
Aberdeenshire Council | £ 310,000 |
Angus Council | £ 788,958 |
Argyll & Bute Council | £ 915,000 |
City of Edinburgh Council | £ 5,000,000 |
Clackmannanshire Council | £ 367,000 |
Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (Western Isles Council) | £ 128,850 |
Dumfries and Galloway Council | £ 595,000 |
Dundee City Council | £ 2,460,000 |
East Ayrshire Council | £ 555,000 |
East Lothian Council | £ 1,400,000 |
East Renfrewshire Council | £ 1,030,000 |
Falkirk Council | £ 190,000 |
Fife Council | £ 2,420,000 |
Glasgow City Council | £ 7,500,000 |
Inverclyde Council | £ 585,000 |
Midlothian Council | £ 191,962 |
Moray Council | £ 778,800 |
NHS Grampian | £ 817,500 |
NHS Lanarkshire | £ 210,000 |
NHS Lothian | £ 90,000 |
North Ayrshire Council | £ 400,000 |
North Lanarkshire Council | £ 1,066,978 |
Perth and Kinross Council | £ 1,353,000 |
Renfrewshire Council | £ 695,000 |
Scottish Borders Council | £ 1,200,000 |
Scottish Environment Protection Agency | £ 120,000 |
South Ayrshire Council | £ 510,000 |
South Lanarkshire Council | £ 1,200,000 |
Stirling Council | £ 513,000 |
TACTRAN | £ 250,000 |
The Highland Council | £ 1,968,560 |
West Dunbartonshire Council | £ 740,000 |
West Lothian Council | £ 641,500 |
ZetTrans | £ 200,000 |
- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 September 2021
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 14 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the announcement by the UK Government not to proceed with plans to introduce vaccine passports.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 14 September 2021
- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 August 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 13 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown of where buses funded through the Scottish Ultra-Low Emission Bus Scheme (SULEBS) are being built.
Answer
The completed bids are published on the Transport Scotland website. The manufacturer that has been contracted by the Bus Operators to supply the battery electric buses is noted at https://www.transport.gov.scot/public-transport/buses/scottish-ultra-low-emission-bus-scheme/scottish-ultra-low-emission-bus-scheme-completed-bids/ 207 of the total 272 buses funded under SULEBS have been ordered from Alexander Dennis Ltd, the bus manufacturing company based in Larbert, Scotland.
- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 August 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 13 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what measures it put in place to prevent money allocated through the Scottish Ultra-Low Emission Bus Scheme (SULEBS) from being spent outside of Scotland and the UK.
Answer
Under the terms of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) between the UK and EU the Scottish Government is unable to set subsidy rules that restrict support solely to domestic manufacturers. Scotland is bound by TCA and World Trade Organisation rules as is the rest of the UK.
- Asked by: Graham Simpson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 August 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 13 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether buses funded through the Scottish Ultra-Low Emission Bus Scheme (SULEBS) that were built abroad have been subsidised by foreign governments, and, if so, to what extent.
Answer
Of 272 buses supported by the Scottish Ultra-Low Emission Bus Scheme only 61 are being imported from abroad. This is in line with Scottish Government's Trade Vision, where we committed to supporting domestic manufacturing while balancing this with active participation in diversified Global Value Chains. Scotland remains committed to a rules-based trade agenda and supports open, fair and transparent trade without protectionism.