- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 22 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether the contingency plans put in place to deal with the loss of MV Hamnavoe from the Stromness to Scrabster route were adequate.
Answer
The Scottish Government believes that the contingency arrangements, put in place, and acted upon, by Serco Northlink, were sufficient following, the unforeseen breakdown of the MV Hamnavoe.
We continue to communicate with Serco Northlink to ensure that all efforts are being taken to minimise any disruption to passenger, vehicle and freight traffic between Orkney and the Scottish mainland.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 09 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 21 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government what information it has on the use of hyperbaric chambers for emergencies in each year since 2003, broken down by NHS board area.
Answer
The information available is provided in the following tables:
Table 1: Divers from each NHS Board treated at Aberdeen hyperbaric chamber from 2003 to 2012
Board Area | 2003-09 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 |
Ayrshire and Arran | 1 | | | |
Borders | | | | |
Dumfries and Galloway | | | | |
Greater Glasgow and Clyde | 8 | 1 | | 1 |
Fife | 10 | | | |
Forth Valley | 6 | | 1 | |
Grampian | 24 | 2 | | |
Highland | 5 | 1 | | 1 |
Lanarkshire | 6 | | | |
Lothian | 20 | 2 | | |
Orkney | 1 | | | 1 |
Shetland | 1 | | | |
Tayside | 6 | | | |
Western Isles | | | | |
Other UK | 32 | 6 | 6 | 1 |
Outwith UK | 1 | 1 | | |
TOTAL | 121 | 13 | 7 | 4 |
Note: a breakdown of divers treated by NHS board for the years 2003 to 2009 is not centrally held.
Table 2: Divers from each NHS Board treated at Oban hyperbaric chamber from 2003 to 2012
Board Area | 2003-09 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 |
Ayrshire and Arran | | | | |
Borders | 1 | | | |
Dumfries and Galloway | | | | |
Greater Glasgow and Clyde | 10 | 2 | | 1 |
Fife | 1 | | | |
Forth Valley | 1 | | | |
Grampian | 2 | 2 | | |
Highland | 12 | 2 | 3 | |
Lanarkshire | 2 | | | |
Lothian | 9 | 1 | | |
Orkney | | | | |
Shetland | | | | |
Tayside | 1 | | | 2 |
Western Isles | 5 | 4 | | |
Other UK | 57 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
Outwith UK | | | 1 | |
Not known/Missing | | 1 | | |
TOTAL | 101 | 13 | 8 | 6 |
Note: a breakdown of divers treated by NHS board for the years 2003 to 2009 is not centrally held.
Table 3: Divers from each NHS Board treated at Orkney hyperbaric chamber from 2003 to 2012
Board Area | 2003-09 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 |
Ayrshire and Arran | 1 | | | |
Borders | | | | |
Dumfries and Galloway | | | | |
Greater Glasgow and Clyde | 2 | | | |
Fife | 3 | | | |
Forth Valley | | | | |
Grampian | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
Highland | | | | |
Lanarkshire | | | | |
Lothian | 6 | | | |
Orkney | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Shetland | | | | |
Tayside | | | | |
Western Isles | | | | |
Other UK | 99 | 10 | 14 | 12 |
Outwith UK | 18 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
TOTAL | 139 | 16 | 19 | 14 |
Note: a breakdown of divers treated by NHS board for the years 2003 to 2009 is not centrally held.
Table 4: Divers from each NHS Board treated at Millport hyperbaric chamber from 2003 to 2012
Board Area | 2003-09 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 |
Ayrshire and Arran | 4 | | | |
Borders | | | | |
Dumfries and Galloway | 2 | 2 | | 1 |
Greater Glasgow and Clyde | 23 | 1 | | 1 |
Fife | 1 | | | |
Forth Valley | 1 | | | |
Grampian | | | | 1 |
Highland | 2 | | | |
Lanarkshire | 6 | | 1 | |
Lothian | | | | |
Orkney | | | | |
Shetland | | | | |
Tayside | | | | |
Western Isles | | | | |
Other UK | 20 | | 1 | 1 |
Outwith UK | | | | |
Not Known/Missing | 9 | | | |
TOTAL | 68 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
Note: a breakdown of divers treated by NHS board for the years 2003 to 2009 is not centrally held.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 April 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 16 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on a moratorium on the use of pesticides containing neonicotinoids, in light of the House of Commons' Environmental Audit Committee report, Pollinators and Pesticides, which was published on 5 April 2013.
Answer
The Scottish Government adopted a precautionary approach and supported restrictions to neonicotinoid use, whilst allowing further research to be undertaken to clarify whether these neonicotinoids harm bees in the field.
The European Appeals Committee met on 29 April 2013 to discuss proposals for EU-wide restrictions on the use of certain neonicotinoids, and while they did not reach a qualified majority decision for or against their introduction, the European Commission will nevertheless support restrictions which will come into force on 1 December 2013.”
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 14 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government when it will publish the consultants’ report to the Intergovernmental Scottish Islands Renewables Steering Group.
Answer
The report, entitled the Scottish Islands Renewables Project – Final Report, will be published on 15 May 2013. Copies have been placed in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Bib. number 54946) and it is available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/scottish-islands-renewable-project-final-report.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 April 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 13 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answers to questions S4W-12317 and S4W-12330 by Richard Lochhead on 25 January 2013, whether it will review its responses, in particular its comment that “studies conducted under realistic field conditions have not identified any unacceptable risk at field population level”, in light of the House of Commons' Environmental Audit Committee report, Pollinators and Pesticides, which was published on 5 April 2013.
Answer
The science in relation to neonicotinoids and bees in field conditions is still very unclear. However, on 28 April 2013, whilst supporting a precautionary approach and Europe’s proposed restrictions for the use of neonicotinoids, I said that given the lack of conclusive evidence, research will need to be undertaken to give us the clarity we seek.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 April 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 13 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government further to the answer to question S4W-12316 by Richard Lochhead on 25 January 2013, whether it has received the UK Advisory Committee on Pesticide’s advice.
Answer
Yes, the Scottish Government has received ACP’s advice and it helped inform the Government’s position, which I announced on 28 April 2013, on the European Commission’s restrictions on neonicotinoids.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 April 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 13 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government whether the waste from Scotland’s nuclear reactors that is currently stored in England would be returned if Scotland became independent and what the reasons are for its position on this matter.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S4W-14255 on 7 May 2013. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 April 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 13 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government whether Scotland would have to pay toward continuing to store the waste from its nuclear reactors that is currently stored in England if Scotland became independent and, if so, how much, and what the reasons are for its position on this matter.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S4W-14255 on 7 May 2013. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 May 2013
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 16 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government when it will publish the consultants’ report to the Intergovernmental Scottish Islands Renewables Steering Group.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 16 May 2013
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 24 April 2013
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 8 May 2013
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answers to questions S4W-13559 and S4W-13887 by Fergus Ewing on 20 March 2013 and 22 April 2013 respectively, whether it will state what estimate it has made of net jobs for each project receiving funding support from the Renewable Energy Investment Fund.
Answer
Investment decisions by REIF are made following consideration of a range of commercially sensitive information and analysis. This includes the net jobs estimated for each project which will not be divulged on a project by project basis but will form part of the evaluation of REIF after its initial three years of operation. For project deals completed, the intention is that the level of investment and investment leveraged will be made publicly available with the agreement of co-investors.