- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 21 December 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what work it has undertaken, since its announcement on 12 September 2018 that mesh surgery would be halted, to ensure that all NHS boards comply with this instruction and not use mesh as happened previously following the suspension announced in 2014 when some boards continued to carry out mesh procedures.
Answer
Following the 12 September announcement of the halt, the Chief Medical Officer wrote to all Health Board Chief Executives and Medical Directors in order to instruct them that no further procedures were to be carried out. An exception was permitted in the case of those women who were already on the waiting list. In those circumstances surgery was allowed to go ahead, providing clinicians firstly explained the situation to the patient and sought fresh consent, and Scottish Government officials required Health Boards to confirm that those discussions had taken place.
Health Boards confirm they have complied with the instruction to halt procedures, and surgery has gone ahead only in the exceptional circumstances noted above.
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 17 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 20 December 2018
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 20 December 2018
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 12 December 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what further work it has undertaken with the Department of Health and Social Care, and the other devolved administrations, regarding the establishment of a mesh database.
Answer
Officials have continued to meet with colleagues in the Department of Health and Social Care as well as the other devolved administrations, the British Society of Urogynaecology, and the British Association of Urologiccal Surgeons in order to progress development of a registry.
An outline of an interim registry has been agreed upon and is expected to become operational in the spring of next year, and officials will be considering information governance aspects in order to ensure that NHSScotland can fully participate. A bespoke registry will continue to be developed after implemetation of the interim solution, with delivery expected in around two years.
Both the interim and bespoke registries will record all stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse procedures, not just those that involve mesh repair. Further, they will record patient reported outcomes in addition to clinician reports.
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 12 December 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what progress has been made with the development and implementation of the high vigilance restricted use protocol for mesh procedures.
Answer
Health Boards have nominated 'Accountable Officers' who, in each Health Board that carries out mesh procedures in the future, will be responsible for ensuring that the necessary high vigilance measures have been followed in every case.
In February Accountable Officers will meet with Scottish Government and NHS ISD officials, as well as members of Healthcare Improvement Scotland's Mesh Oversight Group, in order to progress the development of the protocol. In doing so, Accountable Officers will take account of NICE guidelines, Royal College of Surgeons training guidelines, the Mesh Oversight Group's newly developed Self-Assessment Tool, and the views of regional clinical groups, the latter having been asked to give careful consideration to the issue following the announcement of the halt in September 2018.
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 13 December 2018
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 13 December 2018
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 03 December 2018
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 6 December 2018
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 6 December 2018
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 26 November 2018
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 29 November 2018
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 29 November 2018
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 November 2018
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 22 November 2018
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 22 November 2018
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 November 2018
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 15 November 2018
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 15 November 2018
- Asked by: Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 05 November 2018
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 8 November 2018
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 8 November 2018