To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will provide an update on the inshore fisheries review, including the number of submissions to the most recent consultation and the likely date for the publication of a draft strategy and subsequent legislation, and whether there has been any delay in respect of the review and, if so, for what reason.
The strategic review ofinshore fisheries is being carried out through the Scottish Inshore FisheriesAdvisory Group (SIFAG), the Executive’s main source of stakeholder advice oninshore fisheries matters.
There are three key strandsto the strategic review:
review of the effectiveness of inshore fisheriesmanagement to date;
development of a strategy and management frameworkfor inshore fisheries, and
development of a plan to move from the existingsystem to any future system.
The first strand focusesprimarily on the general use of prohibitions under the Inshore Fishing (Scotland)Act 1984. Twenty-four responses were received to a consultation on the use of the act, and the conclusions of that consultation will feed into thedevelopment of a strategy. We will also be having parallel discussions withRegulating Order grantees and applicants. Royal Society for the Protection of Birdsand Scottish Natural Heritage commissioned a report on environmentalintegration in inshore fisheries management, which will act as the mainenvironmental consideration of the review. That report was published on 3 December 2003, andthe project’s steering group will make recommendations to SIFAG.
On the second strand,sub-groups of SIFAG have been convening on a regular basis, supported bySEERAD, to develop a draft strategy and options for local managementstructures. SIFAG will consider drafts of both at the group’s next fullmeeting, which I expect to be in January or February.
Following SIFAGconsideration of a draft strategy and management framework, there will be aconsultation with a wide range of inshore fisheries stakeholders. The extentand timing of any legislation will depend on the conclusions reached by SIFAG.There have been no significant delays in progress, and given the emphasis onstakeholder participation, the timing of the review is flexible to accommodateindustry priorities and responsibilities.