Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 28 September 2024
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 1207 questions Show Answers

|

Question reference: S1W-34327

  • Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 27 February 2003
  • Current Status: Answered by Mike Watson on 7 March 2003

To ask the Scottish Executive whether Scotland is represented in the European Commission's Culture 2000 programme and what projects have (a) been supported by and (b) received funds from the programme.

Question reference: S1W-34328

  • Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 27 February 2003
  • Current Status: Answered by Elaine Murray on 7 March 2003

To ask the Scottish Executive whether any minister or official attended the meeting of sports ministers in Brussels on 24 and 25 February 2003 to discuss education, youth and culture policies and, if so, whether it will report back on the matters raised.

Question reference: S1W-34160

  • Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 February 2003
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 6 March 2003

To ask the Scottish Executive how many three- and four-year-old children have been in pre-school education and what proportion of these received provision in centres run by (a) local authorities, (b) the voluntary sector and (c) the private sector in each year since 1995.

Question reference: S1O-06588

  • Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 February 2003
  • Current Status: Answered by Mike Watson on 6 March 2003

To ask the Scottish Executive when it will announce its proposals for the future funding and organisation of the museum and heritage sector.

Question reference: S1W-34156

  • Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 February 2003
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 5 March 2003

To ask the Scottish Executive how many free places are available in local authority-run nursery schools for three- and four-year-old children and what shortfall in places is estimated compared with parental demand.

Question reference: S1W-34164

  • Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 February 2003
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 5 March 2003

To ask the Scottish Executive how many qualified nursery teachers have worked in pre-school education in each year since 1995.

Question reference: S1W-34163

  • Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 February 2003
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 5 March 2003

To ask the Scottish Executive what the average ratio of qualified nursery teachers to children is in pre-school centres run by (a) local authorities and (b) the private sector.

Question reference: S1W-34147

  • Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 February 2003
  • Current Status: Answered by Jim Wallace on 3 March 2003

To ask the Scottish Executive what consideration it has given to the judgement in the case considered in the Supreme Court of the United States of America, Kumho Tire Co v Carmichael (US 137 1999); whether it agrees that a court's "gatekeeping" function in respect of the reliability of expert evidence applies to all expert evidence, whether or not it is given by scientists, and, if so, what steps it is taking to ensure that such a function is exercised in the same way in Scotland.

Question reference: S1W-34148

  • Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 February 2003
  • Current Status: Answered by Jim Wallace on 3 March 2003

To ask the Scottish Executive what consideration it has given to the recent amendment to the Federal Rule of Evidence No 702 as adopted by the United States Congress which took effect on 1 December 2000 for courts in the United States of America and, in particular, the provision in this rule that states "if scientific, technical, or other specialised knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case"; whether it will assess the present rules of expert evidence in Scotland against these criteria; whether the Scottish rules fall short of this standard and, if so, in what ways, and whether it will bring forward proposals to improve rules of evidence based upon this standard.

Question reference: S1W-34146

  • Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 19 February 2003
  • Current Status: Answered by Jim Wallace on 3 March 2003

To ask the Scottish Executive what consideration it has given to the Daubert judgement which currently governs the admissibility of expert testimony in courts in the United States of America and, in particular, the implications of the judgement with regard to the present means, technique and quality of similar evidence offered in Scottish courts, with particular reference to fingerprint evidence brought forward by the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service in criminal cases in the last five years from experts working in the Scottish Criminal Records Office.