- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 August 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 28 August 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what the closing date was for the submission of tenders for the refurbishment of HM Prison Barlinnie's B hall.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:The closing date for the submission of tenders was 4 May 2001.
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 31 July 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how many penalties for non-compliance under the Building (Scotland) Act 1959 were imposed in (a) 1997, (b) 1998, (c) 1999 and (d) 2000.
Answer
Responsibility for the enforcement of building regulations lies with the local authorities. The information requested is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jack McConnell on 19 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what progress has been made with regard to the recommendations in the report Citi'ens of a Multilingual World by the Action Group for Languages.
Answer
I had intended to respond formally to this report in March 2001. However, in order to ensure a co-ordinated, strategic approach to curriculum development within the context of National Priorities, this statement was delayed. I will outline our response in detail as soon as possible.
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 01 June 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 15 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-13449 by Colin Boyd QC on 1 March 2001, whether it will provide a breakdown of the number of cases within each category listed which were marked as no proceedings due to a time bar in the courts, in each year from 1997-98 to 2000-01.
Answer
The time bar in question is not one which relates to the courts. It is, rather, the one set out in section 136 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, which prevents the commencement of summary proceedings once six months have passed from the date of the contravention. The figures represent cases which were not reported to Procurators Fiscal until it was already too late to meet that time limit. The figures are:
1997-98 | 1,420 |
1998-99 | 1,278 |
1999-00 | 1,533 |
2000-01 | 2,009 |
The recent year-on-year increase is disturbing and the Crown Office has recently reminded reporting agencies again of the need to report cases within time bar.
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 01 June 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 15 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what targets were set and what targets were achieved by the Supreme Courts of Scotland in each year from 1997-98 to 2000-01.
Answer
The table which follows sets out the key performance targets set for the Scottish Court Service in relation to the Supreme Courts of Scotland in each year from 1997-98 to 2000-01 together with the respective percentage achievement rates.Cases which fail to be allocated within the relevant target period, even by one day, score 0% achievement, hence the outturn in 2000-01 when pressure on the courts resulted in delays running beyond the target periods. In addition, cases may be allocated to diets outwith these targets to accommodate the availability of counsel, agents or witnesses.Key Performance Targets
| 1997-98 | 1998-99 | 1999-00 | 2000-01 |
Efficiency |
Percentage of Court of Session diets allocated within waiting periods set by the Lord President | Target | 90 | 92 | 93 | 93 |
Outturn | 94 | 93 | 84 | 30 |
Percentage of solemn and summary appeals on roll within waiting periods set by the Lord Justice General | Target | 70 | 70 | 60 | 60 |
Outturn | 70 | 59 | 45 | 50 |
Quality |
Percentage achievement of administrative standards set by the Lord President/Lord Justice General | Target | 90 | 92 | 95 | 95 |
Outturn | 94 | 97 | 91 | 90 |
Tables A and B3 provide a more detailed breakdown of the specific targets set by the Lord President and Lord Justice General in relation to waiting periods and administrative standards in both criminal and civil proceedings. New administrative targets were adopted in 1998-99.Table A
Supreme Courts Waiting periods |
| % of diets allocated in the year within waiting period |
CIVIL | waiting period (term weeks except*) | | | | |
Civil Business | Target | 1997-98 | 1998-99 | 1999-2000 | 2000-01 |
(a) Appeals against Interlocutory orders (from date of lodging) | 4 | 100% | 97% | 80% | 31% |
(b) All other appeals (from date sent to roll)# | 18 | 93% | 11% | 0% | 0% |
(c) Jury trials(from date issues approved) | 19 | 100% | 100% | 79% | 50% |
(d) Ordinary proofs (from date proof allowed) | 19 | 89% | 81% | 84% | 38% |
Criminal |
Criminal Business - Appeals | | | | | |
Leave to Appeal - Solemn and Summary | | | | | |
Applications for leave to appeal; | | | | | |
(i) from date of report received to allocation to single judge | 1* | 71% | 92% | 55% | 64% |
(ii) from intimation of appeal against refusal to allocate to 2/3 judges | 2* | 66% | 69% | 29% | 38% |
Appeals - Solemn | | | | | |
Notes of Appeal; | | | | | |
(from date when leave to appeal granted) | | | | | |
(i) Sentence | 5* | 90% | 78% | 56% | 36% |
(ii) Conviction and Sentence | 5 | 16% | 0% | 2% | 0% |
Appeals - Summary | | | | | |
Notes of Appeal against Sentence; | | | | | |
(from date when leave to appeal granted) | | | | | |
(i) Accused in custody | 4* | 91% | 76% | 56% | 38% |
(i)Other | 6* | 90% | 88% | 70% | 67% |
Stated Cases; | | | | | |
(from date when leave to appeal granted) | | | | | |
(i) Accused in custody | 4 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
(i)Other | 6 | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Bills of Suspension (from date lodged) | 4 | 100% | 31% | 4% | 8% |
Target (a) above came into operation with effect from 1 October 1997 and was set at two weeks for the duration of 1997-98.# This target has been omitted from agency annual achievement rate calculations since 1998-99.Table B
Supreme Courts Administrative Targets |
Description | 1998-1999 | 1999-2000 | 2000-01 |
To process summonses, petitions and appeals from inferior courts within one working day of their acceptance | 100 | 100 | 100 |
To notify solicitors of returned citations on the date of their receipt. | 100 | 100 | 100 |
To notify solicitors of custody reports on the date of their receipt. | 100 | 100 | 100 |
To issue all extracted decrees of divorce on the first working day it would be competent to do so and to issue all other extracted decrees within five working days of the request | 98 | 100 | 100 |
To secure accurate and timeous publication of the Rolls of Court and to deliver to practitioners in Edinburgh, the weekly and daily Rolls of Court on the day of publication. | 100 | 100 | 100 |
To intimate disposal of appeals under solemn criminal procedure within one working day of determination by the Court. | 97 | 88 | 76 |
To intimate disposal of appeals under summary criminal procedure within five working days of determination by the Court. | 73 | 75 | 65 |
To prepare applications for leave to appeal. and appeals against refusal of leave within one working day from the date of receipt of summary appeal papers, or the Judge's report in solemn appeals. | 99 | 65 | 71 |
To intimate the grant or refusal of leave to appeal within two working days of receipt of the papers. | 91 | 79 | 53 |
To complete the audit of at least 95% of all Curatory Accounts within three months of lodgement. | 100 | 100 | 97 |
To complete the audit of at least 75% of all Judicial Factory Accounts within two months of lodgement. | 100 | 100 | 100 |
To issue to solicitors in the Court of Session monthly accounts within seven days of the end of each period. | 97 | 69 | 99 |
To process all invoices and claims within forty eight hours of receipt. | 100 | 100 | 100 |
To reply to all correspondence, except that which requires extensive investigation, within three working days of receipt. | 100 | 96 | 95 |
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 01 June 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 15 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how many custodial sentences were imposed by each sheriff court in each year from 1997-98 to 2000-01.
Answer
The available information is given in the table. Figures for 2000 are not yet available.Number of proceedings in Scottish sheriff courts resulting in a custodial sentence
| Calendar year |
Sheriff court | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 |
All courts | 13,276 | 13,274 | 13,389 |
Aberdeen | 924 | 862 | 843 |
Airdrie | 309 | 310 | 383 |
Alloa | 96 | 119 | 114 |
Arbroath | 142 | 189 | 141 |
Ayr | 406 | 460 | 516 |
Banff | 38 | 31 | 32 |
Campbeltown | 22 | 33 | 30 |
Cupar | 100 | 74 | 52 |
Dingwall | 57 | 67 | 53 |
Dornoch | 6 | 15 | 8 |
Dumbarton | 398 | 369 | 374 |
Dumfries | 215 | 207 | 210 |
Dundee | 665 | 745 | 728 |
Dunfermline | 303 | 257 | 232 |
Dunoon | 71 | 48 | 34 |
Duns | 14 | 20 | 10 |
Edinburgh | 1,408 | 1,393 | 1,436 |
Elgin | 141 | 89 | 117 |
Falkirk | 317 | 392 | 357 |
Forfar | 82 | 65 | 59 |
Fort William | 68 | 53 | 52 |
Glasgow | 2,450 | 2,406 | 2,689 |
Greenock | 574 | 645 | 630 |
Haddington | 95 | 110 | 73 |
Hamilton | 586 | 504 | 486 |
Inverness | 243 | 236 | 217 |
Jedburgh | 76 | 68 | 66 |
Kilmarnock | 714 | 945 | 1,006 |
Kirkcaldy | 570 | 553 | 528 |
Kirkcudbright | 44 | 33 | 38 |
Kirkwall | 19 | 15 | 26 |
Lanark | 116 | 92 | 103 |
Lerwick | 34 | 28 | 45 |
Linlithgow | 242 | 197 | 235 |
Lochmaddy | 5 | 10 | 9 |
Oban | 45 | 44 | 45 |
Paisley | 696 | 689 | 633 |
Peebles | 11 | 19 | 32 |
Perth | 280 | 230 | 202 |
Peterhead | 132 | 138 | 96 |
Portree | 6 | 4 | 2 |
Rothesay | 17 | 18 | 4 |
Selkirk | 42 | 51 | 43 |
Stirling | 202 | 136 | 145 |
Stonehaven | 36 | 35 | 30 |
Stornoway | 51 | 38 | 37 |
Stranraer | 138 | 150 | 145 |
Tain | 32 | 35 | 18 |
Wick | 38 | 47 | 25 |
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 01 June 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 15 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how many legal staff in (a) the Crown Office and (b) the Procurator Fiscal Service ended their employment (i) within six months, (ii) between six and 12 months and (iii) between 12 and 18 months of them taking up post and what posts were affected by departures in these categories, in each year from 1997-98 to date.
Answer
The numbers of legal staff in (a) the Crown Office and (b) the Procurator Fiscal Service ended their employment (i) within six months, (ii) between six and 12 months and (iii) between 12 and 18 months of them taking up post and the posts affected by these departures, in each year from 1997-98 are shown in the table.
- Crown Office - Nil
- Procurator Fiscal Service
Year | Within 6 months | 6 to 12 months | 12 to 18 months |
1997-98 | Nil | 1 Depute, Aberdeen | Nil |
1998-99 | Nil | Nil | Nil |
1999-2000 | Nil | Nil | 1 Depute, Glasgow |
2000-01 | 1 Depute, Aberdeen | 1 Depute, Aberdeen | 1 Depute, Edinburgh |
2001 (to July) | Nil | Nil | 1 Depute, Glasgow |
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 11 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how many prison chaplains have been appointed on a temporary contract in 2001, at which prisons they are based and which denomination they represent.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:There were seven temporary contracts in 2001 of which four are Church of Scotland and three Roman Catholic.The appointments are shown in the table:
Prison | Church of Scotland | Roman Catholic |
Barlinnie | 1 | 1 |
Dumfries | 1 | |
Perth | 2 | 2 |
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 11 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how many prosecutions for non-compliance of building standards regulations under section 11 of the Building (Scotland) Act 1959 there were in (a) 1997, (b) 1998, (c) 1999 and (d) 2000.
Answer
Cases brought under section 11 of the Building (Scotland) Act 1959 are not separately identifiable on the Scottish Executive classification of crimes and offences. Between 1997 and 1999 there were eight prosecutions in Scottish courts where the main offence was under the Building (Scotland) Act 1959. Data for the year 2000 are not yet available.
- Asked by: Michael Matheson, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 11 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how many prison chaplaincy posts are currently vacant, at which prisons and for which denominations.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:The information is given in the table:
Prison | Church of Scotland | Roman Catholic | Scottish Episcopal |
Barlinnie | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Castle Huntly | 1 | | |
Cornton Vale | | 1 | |
Dumries | | 1 | |
Glenochil | | 1 | |
Greenock | 1 | 1 | |
Inverness | 1 | | |
Low Moss | 1 | 1 | |
Noranside | 1 | 1 | |
Peterhead | | | 1 |
Polmont | 1 | | |
Shotts | 1 | 1 | |