- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 March 2018
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 14 March 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what analysis the health secretary has made of the potential implications for Scotland of the findings in the recent annual report of the Chief Medical Officer for England, which addressed the impact on public health of pollution.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 14 March 2018
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 February 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Annabelle Ewing on 1 March 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether building accreditation schemes provide adequate protection for non-contracting neighbours in communal properties.
Answer
I assume the member’s concern relates to common repairs.
Procedures for agreeing how common repairs can be carried out may be set out in title deeds for the properties.
If the title deeds do not lay down procedures for agreeing how common repairs can be carried out, decisions in relation to common areas of tenements may be taken under the Tenement Management Scheme contained in the Tenements (Scotland) Act 2004. Owners who do not agree with decisions made under the Tenement Management Scheme can make an application to the sheriff for those decisions to be annulled.
If a decision has been taken to appoint contractors to carry out repairs under the title deeds or the Tenement Management Scheme, provision s for redress if building work on common areas does not meet required standards may depend on contractual and other arrangements in place when the contractors were engaged to carry out the work. Defective works may also, depending on the circumstances, result in other legal remedies being available to owners under the law of delict or otherwise.
If the member wishes to write to me to outline in more detail his specific concerns, I would be happy to consider further. However, the Scottish Government cannot intervene, or comment on, any private legal dispute.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 February 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Annabelle Ewing on 1 March 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what provisions there are to deal with disputes regarding party walls.
Answer
Disputes about party walls are private legal matters to be resolved by agreement between those involved in the dispute or, if they cannot reach agreement, by going to court or by using Alternative Dispute Resolution, such as mediation. The Scottish Mediation Network can provide information on how to find to a mediator: https://www.scottishmediation.org.uk/
Under the common law doctrine of common interest which can apply to a shared wall, work on the wall can be legally challenged (i.e. an action can be raised in court) if it endangers the stability of the wall.
In England and Wales, the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 makes detailed provision on disputes in relation to party walls. The Scottish Government has no current plans to introduce legislation along the lines of the 1996 Act.
The Scottish Law Commission reviewed the law on boundary walls in 1998. The Commission took the view at the time that was not necessary to introduce legislation either to reform or restate the existing law on boundary walls. The Commission’s Report is available at http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/3012/7989/6663/rep163.pdf
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 February 2018
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 28 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what biological testing is carried out on salmon processing plant effluent.
Answer
Scottish Government does not test the outflow of fish processing plants for pathogens.
The Code of Good Practice for Scottish Finfish Aquaculture recommends that drainage from areas where effluent and fish by products are generated should feed into a disinfection facility, with subsequent treatment of any discharge in accordance with CAR license conditions in place to control chemical discharge. Scottish Government’s fish health inspectorate produced disinfection guidance in 2006 which should be regarded as best practice at fish farm sites and processing plants. The disinfection guide can be found online; http://www.gov.scot/Topics/marine/Fish-Shellfish/FHI/healthpractice.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 February 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 28 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what financial compensation has been provided to salmon farms that have culled their stock since 2007, broken down by (a) year and (b) individual farm.
Answer
No salmon farms have been provided with financial compensation for fish culled for disease control purposes.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 February 2018
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 28 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government how many farmed salmon died in 2017 due to mechanical sea lice treatments, including the Thermolicer, Hydrolicer and Optilicer.
Answer
Under current fish health legislation, it is a requirement to report increased mortality in aquaculture animals to either a veterinarian or Scottish Government's fish health inspectorate. As a consequence, the total number of salmon mortalities specifically attributable with mechanical sea lice treatments is not held.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 February 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 28 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what meetings it has had with stakeholders, including the UK Government, in relation to the seafood import provisions of the US Marine Mammal Protection Act, broken down by (a) date and (b) location.
Answer
Since late 2015 the Scottish Government have been in regular dialogue and raising awareness of the MMPA and its potential impact on Scottish seafood exports with Scotland’s aquaculture sector (through the SSPO), within the Seafish Regulatory Experts Group, directly with Seafood Scotland and through the Fisheries Management and Conservation Group which represents 90% of the Scottish commercial fishing industry (FMAC). The vast majority of discussions have taken place by phone and/or email exchanges.
Details of specific meetings are outlined below:
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 19 February 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 27 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-09643 by Kevin Stewart on 19 June 2017, by what date the planning appeal decision regarding Airthrey Kerse in Bridge of Allan (PPA-390-2043) will be made.
Answer
Ministers are currently giving this proposal full and proper consideration and will issue a decision as soon as possible.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 February 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 22 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what action it will take to prohibit the intentional killing or serious injury of marine mammals in all fisheries.
Answer
The Conservation (Natural Habitats etc.) Regulations 1994 (as amended) already protects all cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoises) from deliberate or reckless injury or killing.
The Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 similarly protects seals from intentional or reckless injury or killing. There are some permitted exceptions but these are strictly limited and regulated.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 February 2018
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 22 February 2018
To ask the Scottish Government how it is addressing the welfare challenges associated with brachycephalic dogs.
Answer
The Scottish Government has long stressed that any organisation laying down breed standards must give paramount regard to the health and welfare of the dogs, including the need to avoid breed-specific health problems. We are working with partners such as the Kennel Club and the British Veterinary Association (BVA) to address this issue, including by supporting the BVA’s current `#BreedtoBreathe` campaign.
Going forward, the Scottish Government is considering how we might act to raise awareness of such welfare considerations to those considering purchasing affected breeds. This may be as part of the communications campaign on the risks of buying puppies advertised on-line that we committed to in the 2017-18 Programme for Government. We are also considering developing guidance on this matter under the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006.