Chamber and committees

The Scottish Government uses procurement and climate change policy, law and practice to drive waste minimisation and reuse in public contracts and frameworks.

Techniques such as Life Cycle Impact Mapping are outlined in the statutory guidance on the Sustainable Procurement Duty that is a core part of the Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014. Products and services specifications routinely include environmental standards, while environmental evaluation criteria contribute to contract award decisions.

‘Making Things Last – A circular economy strategy for Scotland’ commits to working with public organisations to identify the products and services where innovation and best practice in public procurement can have the greatest benefit in promoting circular approaches such as leasing, repair and remanufacture, while delivering value for money. It also addresses how to expand that best practice, e.g. through collaborative procurement, guidance or regulation.

While the Scottish Government does not hold details of resource efficiency incentives in public procurement frameworks in the wider public sector, the Scottish Government’s Facilities Management contract is an example of environmental impact reduction. Since 2012, this has led to significant improvements in recycling rates, with a consequent reduction in tonnage to landfill sites of over 11%.

A key element of the Climate Challenge Fund is the delivery of the Community Action Support Programme, which develops the capacity of community groups (not just those with Climate Challenge Fund funding) wishing to tackle climate change by providing workshops, peer-to-peer networking opportunities and other resources. In a recent review of the Climate Challenge Fund (http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2015/11/4383), support provided by the Climate Challenge Fund was widely acknowledged as a strength of the scheme.

The Climate Challenge Fund also makes available development grants (up to £1,500) to help community-led organisations develop an application for future climate action funding or to support peer-to-peer learning activities that build their capacity to tackle climate change.

The Scottish Government has commissioned two external reviews of the Climate Challenge Fund, in 2011 and 2015. Both independent reviews highlighted that the Climate Challenge Fund has been a success on many levels.

2011 Review: http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2011/06/28142552/0

2015 Review: http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2015/11/4383

In addition, since its inception in 2008, the Climate Challenge Fund has supported community-led climate change mitigation projects.

Scottish Ministers will make an announcement on the future of the Climate Challenge Fund later this year as part of the draft budget 2017-18 process.

Waste minimisation and reuse are core to delivering a more circular economy, and the Scottish Government has set out its priorities for a circular economy in its strategy ‘Making Things Last’, published in February 2016. Local authorities and other bodies have a statutory duty to apply the waste hierarchy, prioritising waste prevention and reuse. The Scottish Government, through Zero Waste Scotland, is supporting local authorities to improve reuse collection, storage, retail and communications. This includes activity at Household Waste Recycling Centres and through bulky waste services; and through the National Reuse Phone line, making it easier to donate items.

Between 31 December 2012 and 19 November 2015, the Scottish Government is aware of 23 beavers on Tayside that are known to have been collected for post mortem examination. Of these, 21 beavers had been shot and the remaining 2 were killed in road traffic accidents. No dead animals reported to Scottish Natural Heritage since October 2015 have shown signs of having been shot. The Scottish Government is aware of anecdotal reports of the killing of beavers this year, but has no further firm evidence of such activity.

I met with representatives of Graham’s Dairy on 5 December 2014 at Grahams Bridge of Allan site where I received a tour of the Dairy and a brief outline of their development plans at Hill of Drip and Airthrey Kerse. I should like to address the specific point on S5W-00104 by explaining that due to a Parliament’s Chamber Desk system problem we did not have this question in our system for which I should like to apologise.

The EU has produced reports on the possible extension of mandatory country of origin requirements to other meats, dairy products and meat and dairy when used as key ingredients in other foods, however the commission favours a voluntary approach. The Scottish Government continues to work with Food Standards Scotland and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to ensure that Scottish interests are reflected in on-going EU discussions on country of origin labelling.

We have had some initial internal discussions about whether or not the guidance in the Scottish Seal Management Code of Practice on this might be revised.

We know, however, that it is a complex area involving an extremely delicate balance between carcass recovery and the health and safety of individuals being asked to recover any carcasses.

We need to be aware that it may not, ultimately, prove possible to do more than encourage carcass recovery where it is safe to do so.

The number of seal carcasses recovered and the numbers examined at post mortem each year is as follows:

The information on carcasses recovered is derived from statutory seal licence returns submitted quarterly by seal licence holders. The information on post-mortems is derived from the Scottish Marine Animal Strandings Scheme.

There are several reasons why not all animals recovered are examined at post-mortem:- firstly not all carcasses recovered are in a fresh enough condition for post-mortem, second in many cases cause of death is very clear from physical inspection making post-mortem less of a priority and lastly expensive post-mortems are reserved for a random sample of cases or for cases where a cause of death is unclear.

The cause of death in all cases examined at post-mortem was physical trauma due to shooting and death was almost immediate in 34 out of 40 cases. In the remaining 6 cases, the evidence regarding immediate death was unclear with potential welfare concerns in, perhaps, 2 of these 6 cases.

*In some cases, carcasses, which cannot be recovered at the time of shooting, will later come ashore and be reported by members of the public.