- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 11 January 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has received the Quigley Report on tuition fees or when it expects to receive it, and when it will bring this matter before the Parliament with its response.
Answer
No. The Quigley Committee is required to provide a report in time for it to be laid before each House of the Westminster Parliament and the Northern Ireland Assembly not later than 1 April 2000. The Executive will consider its response when the report is received.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 11 January 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is aware of a proposal to privatise the General Medical Practitioners Service of the Scottish Prison Service, whether it considers that this proposal would create a precedent for publicly funded health services, and whether it will make an announcement on this subject in due course.
Answer
The Scottish Prison Service's Board has accepted the recommendation of its Medical Service Review Group that, to ensure the consistent and cost effective delivery of medical services in Scottish prisons they should be contracted out. SPS is therefore developing a detailed service specification and will shortly test the level of interest by advertising SPS's intent to contract out these services.
I do not consider that a precedent will be created.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 11 January 2000
To ask the Presiding Officer what proposals or options are before the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body in relation to Queensberry House and whether MSPs will be consulted on this issue.
Answer
There have been no further developments affecting Queensberry House since my answer of 10 December to Margo MacDonald (SIW-3026). This reported that there are no plans to demolish Queensberry House and that the SPCB is awaiting the results of detailed specialist investigations and the associated cost estimates of remedial works. The SPCB will continue to keep MSPs informed about the Holyrood building at key stages in the project.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Peter Peacock on 28 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what provision it has made to ensure consistency and quality of regulation between private and state nurseries.
Answer
The proposed Scottish Commission for the Regulation of Care will regulate all day care for children, whoever the provider. We believe that this will provide consistency and quality of regulation not only between the private and public sectors but also across Scotland. We intend to introduce legislation to establish the Commission as soon as possible, and we issued a pre-legislative consultation document: Regulating Care and the Social Service Workforce on 23 December.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 10 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Donald Dewar on 24 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what progress has been made in drawing up a shortlist of successors to Mr John Rafferty.
Answer
This is a matter for further consideration.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 10 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Donald Dewar on 24 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there has been a breach of the Civil Service Code by Mr John Rafferty.
Answer
The circumstances of Mr Rafferty's departure did not rest on a breach of the Civil Service Code.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 10 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Donald Dewar on 24 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what are the terms of the financial package made following the departure of Mr John Rafferty and in particular what arrangements have been made for compensation to Mr John Rafferty within the package.
Answer
Mr Rafferty will receive what he is due under the terms of his contract of employment. A copy of the model contract for Special Advisers is available in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICE).
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 10 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Donald Dewar on 24 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the First Minister agreed a statement with Mr John Rafferty, and if so, what was the content of that statement.
Answer
No.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 10 December 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Donald Dewar on 24 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive how many times the First Minister spoke to the Prime Minister about the departure of Mr John Rafferty.
Answer
It is not my practice to reveal whether I have, or have not, had any conversations with the Prime Minister.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 03 November 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 10 December 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive how Midlothian Council intends to finance the proposed upgrading of the A701.
Answer
The Council intends to finance the project by conventional procurement methods. £2.5 million capital consent awarded from the previous Government's Transport Challenge Fund continues to be advanced to the Council on the agreed phased arrangements to set against total costs.