- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 11 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is aware that a substantial crater has appeared at Straiton beside the proposed route for the A701 and that the proposed route could be subject to unpredictable subsidence owing to under-mining, and whether it will reconsider on safety grounds the case for holding a public inquiry to allow the evidence to be assessed.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is aware that subsidence has occurred recently. It is for Midlothian Council, who now have the benefit of deemed planning permission for their proposals, to decide whether to proceed with the development. There are no powers under planning legislation to hold an inquiry into a particular application after planning permission has been granted for that application. It would be open to the council, however, to consider whether they wished to hold an inquiry under any other powers which might be available to them.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 6 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive why the A8000 has not been designated a trunk road.
Answer
I refer Lord James to the answer I gave to question S1W-4553 on 13 March 2000.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 6 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive when the next trunk roads review will take place.
Answer
I refer Lord James to the answer I gave to question S1W-2873 on 13 January 2000.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 6 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the A8000 meets all the criteria required to be a trunk road.
Answer
I refer Lord James to the answer I gave to question S1W-4553 on 13 March 2000.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 6 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the proposals by Midlothian Council for the A701 approved by the Minister for Transport and the Environment, were verified as being the same as those presented to the public for consultation prior to approval by Midlothian Council on 14 September 1999.
Answer
The Scottish Executive does not have details of documents presented to the public at stages prior to their submission to the Scottish Ministers.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 6 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will outline each difference between the A701 project presented to and approved by Ministers and earlier project details presented to the public for consultation as part of the statutory planning process.
Answer
The Scottish Executive does not have details of documents presented to the public at stages prior to their submission to the Scottish Ministers.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 6 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether its current integrated transport policies are material considerations in decisions on planning applications.
Answer
There is no statutory definition of "material consideration" and it is ultimately for the Courts to decide what is material. Government policy and guidance are, however, generally regarded as material in decisions on planning applications.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 6 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive why the numerous objections to the A701 proposals and the proposals' relationship to its wider planning policies relating to the protection of the environment were not considered sufficient material considerations to influence the decision not to hold a public inquiry on the A701 proposals.
Answer
The Scottish Ministers gave careful consideration to all material considerations. They were not, however, considered sufficient to outweigh the policies in the statutory development plan.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 6 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the approved structure and local plans for Midlothian covering the A701 corridor predate its current integrated transport policies and how those plans reflect its current transport policies.
Answer
The approved structure plan and the adopted local plans for Midlothian predate National Planning Policy Guideline (NPPG) 17: Transport and Planning. The transport policies in the structure plan are considered to be generally in line with the policies in the NPPG.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 March 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 6 April 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there is any statutory or legal obligation on Midlothian Council to implement the Minister for Transport and the Environment's recommendations regarding the package of sustainable transport measures which form part of proposals for the A701 and what the nature is of any such obligations.
Answer
Implementation of the planning permission is a matter for Midlothian Council.