- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 24 October 2000
To ask the Presiding Officer whether the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body received any information from the Scottish Office on whether the appointment of Bovis as main contractor for the Holyrood project was in accordance with UK and EU guidelines for public building procurement.
Answer
The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) was briefed by senior Parliament officials about the appointment of Bovis as Construction Managers for the Holyrood project following the transfer of responsibility for the project to the SPCB on 1 June 1999. The SPCB is satisfied that the appointment was undertaken properly and in full compliance with existing regulations. Furthermore, the independent assessments of the Holyrood project, by John Spencely and the Auditor General for Scotland, gave no suggestion that any procurement regulations had been breached.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 24 October 2000
To ask the Presiding Officer whether the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body received any information from the Scottish Office on whether the tender bid of Bovis was higher that that of McAlpine's and what criteria were applied in appointing Bovis as main contractor to the Holyrood project.
Answer
The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) was briefed by senior Parliament officials about procedures used for the Construction Management appointment for the Holyrood project following the transfer of responsibility for the project to the SPCB on 1 June 1999. No details of the individual bids involved were reported at that time but I understand that the selection panel were satisfied that, on the basis of price and quality, Bovis were the best candidates for the commission. The Auditor General for Scotland in his recent report confirmed that, in appointing a Construction Manager, Project Management was correct in taking quality as well as price into account.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 24 October 2000
To ask the Presiding Officer whether the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body received any information from the Scottish Office on what consideration was given to the practice resources, back up and track record of Enric Miralles before his appointment.
Answer
The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) was briefed by senior Parliament officials about the selection process which culminated in the appointment of EMBT/RMJM as architects for the new Parliament building, following the transfer of responsibility for the Holyrood Project to the SPCB on 1 June 1999. The briefing indicated that the backgrounds of all shortlisted candidates for the appointment were taken into account before the commission was awarded to EMBT/RMJM. The information was passed on to MSPs in SPCB report no. 1 of 9 June 1999.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 24 October 2000
To ask the Presiding Officer whether the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body received from the Scottish Office evidence that all EU Regulations for public building procurement procedures were fully complied with in respect of all professional appointments, including that of lead architect, associate architects, project managers and other personnel involved in the Holyrood project.
Answer
The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) was briefed by senior Parliament officials about procedures used for appointments of the consultants and professionals involved in the Holyrood project following the transfer of responsibility for the project to the SPCB on 1 June 1999. The SPCB is satisfied that the appointments were undertaken properly and in full compliance with existing regulations. Furthermore, the independent assessments of the Holyrood Project, by John Spencely and the Auditor General for Scotland, gave no suggestion that any procurement regulations had been breached.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 03 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 24 October 2000
To ask the Presiding Officer whether the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body received any information from the Scottish Office on how the composition of the Parliament building project selection panel was decided upon and whether any posts were advertised.
Answer
The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) was briefed by senior Parliament officials about the selection process which culminated in the appointment of EMBT/RMJM as architects for the new Parliament building, following the transfer of responsibility for the Holyrood Project to the SPCB on 1 June 1999. I understand that positions on the panel were not advertised publicly, but that suitably qualified individuals were identified and appointed by the then Secretary of State for Scotland.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 18 October 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what it estimates the market demand for slate to be in Scotland annually.
Answer
Reliable estimates of demand for slate in Scotland are not available. However Scottish Homes estimate that there are currently 642,000 houses with slate roofs in Scotland. It is estimated that around 50% of these homes will require roofing renewal over the next 30 years. In addition, the stock of listed buildings, most of which have slated roofs, provides a large maintenance market for Scottish recycled slate. Approximately 100 listed building repair projects are grant-aided by the Historic Buildings Council for Scotland each year.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Peter Peacock on 18 October 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will be necessary to establish a college to train physical education teachers to meet any increased demand for physical education teachers to be employed in primary and secondary schools.
Answer
There are no plans to establish a college to train physical education teachers.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank McAveety on 18 October 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive how many houses have roofs tiled with slate and what percentage this represents of the total housing stock.
Answer
The 1996 Scottish House Condition Survey estimated that slate was the predominant roof covering for 642,000 houses, or 30% of the stock.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 18 October 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what estimate can be made of the percentage of slate being used in Scotland which is (a) recycled from abroad and (b) imported.
Answer
Ongoing demand in Scotland exists primarily for slate to repair historic buildings of importance. Scottish slate has been out of production since the 1950s and demand for slate in Scotland is met either by recycling slate from existing buildings or by import from the rest of the UK or abroad. Reliable estimates are not available for the amount of slate imported into Scotland although at a UK level around half of demand is met by imports from overseas.
- Asked by: Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, MSP for Lothians, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 September 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 12 October 2000
To ask the Presiding Officer whether the levels of payment of remuneration in respect of the Holyrood Project consultants' fees will be or have been checked to ensure compliance with EU, UK and Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland guidelines on best practice.
Answer
The appointments of the main consultants to the Holyrood Project, including agreement on fee levels, were made prior to 1 June 1999 and were therefore the responsibility of the Scottish Office. I understand however that each member of the Design Team has been appointed under the appropriate terms of appointment as issued by the professional body relevant to their individual disciplines. The standard terms were amended to take into account the particular nature of the project and the specific requirements of the Client. The Construction Manager's contract, for which there is no industry standard, was based on closely related contracts and was agreed by Scottish Office legal advisers. The Spencely report studied the consultants' fees and described them as conventional. The Auditor General for Scotland's recent report confirmed that, in general terms, the appointments of the consultants were properly undertaken.