- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 4 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what its position is in respect of the use by the Deer Commission for Scotland of emergency powers under the Deer (Scotland) Act 1996 to effect the mass cull of deer; whether it is seeking any information from the commission regarding the recent use of such powers at Glenfeshie; whether it will consider the introduction of a moratorium pending a full investigation of the issues involved, and whether, in particular, it will instruct the commission not to implement any further mass cull without a debate in the Parliament where the issues can be fully explored.
Answer
Parliament placed duties on theDeer Commission for Scotland (DCS) under the Deer (Scotland) Act1996 to take action when it is satisfied that serious damage is being caused toagriculture, woodland the natural heritage or a risk to public safety. That actionincludes the emergency culling of deer under section 10.
On the carrying out of this dutyin respect of Glenfeshie, I refer the member to the answer given to questionS2W-7432 on 4 May 2004 . All answers to written parliamentary questions areavailable on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be foundat:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.Ministers will reflect on whatconclusions to draw in the light of the report on the Glenfeshie operations. Giventhe obligations on the DCS under the Deer Act, the options available are unlikelyto include a moratorium on culling.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 4 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is satisfied that proper practices have been followed in respect of the mass cull of deer at Glenfeshie, and whether it will seek an independent opinion in respect of the commission's actions.
Answer
I refer the member to the answergiven to question S2W-7432 4 May 2004. All answers to written parliamentaryquestions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for whichcan be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Patricia Ferguson on 4 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the reports to the First Minister referred to in evidence to the Holyrood Inquiry by the Chief Executive of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and Head of Legal and Parliamentary Services included information on the rising costs of the Holyrood Project and, if so, when such reports were made.
Answer
I refer the member to the answergiven to question S2W-7428 on 4 May 2004. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for whichcan be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank McAveety on 4 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has made any submissions to the consultation regarding the draft Work at Height Regulations conducted by the Health and Safety Executive; whether these regulations will have any adverse impact on the outdoor industry, and what the reasons are for its position on the matter.
Answer
We are aware of the concernsfelt by the outdoor and adventure activities sector about the implementation inthe UK of the EC Directive on Temporary Work at Height. At our request, the Healthand Safety Executive have been copying us into responses from Scotland to theirconsultation on the draft Regulations and, given the importance of this sector toScotland, we will be ready to take this matter up with the UK Government if implementationplans seem likely to be damaging to that sector.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Patricia Ferguson on 4 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-7089 by Ms Patricia Ferguson on 1 April 2004 and the further supplementary statement (WS-19-005 to 008) to the Holyrood Inquiry by the Chief Executive of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and Head of Legal and Parliamentary Services, whether "relevant documentation" includes reports made by the Chief Executive of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and Head of Legal and Parliamentary Services regarding the Holyrood Progress Group to the (a) Minister for Parliamentary Business and the predecessor minister and (b) First Minister and, if so, whether such reports will be published and on what dates the reports were made.
Answer
The “relevant documentation”referred to in the answer to question S2W-7089 includes reports made by the Chief Executive of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and Head of Legal andParliamentary Services to me and the previous Minister for Parliament and to theFirst Minister regarding the Holyrood Progress Group. These reports provided informationfrom time to time on the progress of the Holyrood Project and key developments,including information on costs.
All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for whichcan be found at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
These reports have been providedto the Holyrood Inquiry, who may place them on their website in due course. It isfor the Inquiry to decide which reports they make public.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank McAveety on 4 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has made any representations to Her Majesty's Government with regard to any potential impact on the outdoor industry of the draft Work at Height Regulations.
Answer
I refer the member to the answergiven to question S2W-7439 on 4 May 2004. All answers to written parliamentary questions are availableon the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank McAveety on 4 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it has taken to obtain views from the outdoor industry and related organisations in connection with the draft Work at Height Regulations and, if not, whether it has any plans to do so.
Answer
I refer the member to the answergiven to question S2W-7439 on 4 April 2004. All answers to written parliamentaryquestions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for whichcan be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 4 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will address the concerns of west coast prawn and scallop fishermen in relation to the "designated ports" process that applies in relation to landing haddock under the latest cod recovery programme.
Answer
The designated landing port arrangementsfor haddock apply to catches of haddock taken from the North Sea andEC waters of area IIa, not to west coast catches. However, the changes tothe haddock management arrangements we expect to be agreed soon at Council – whichinclude changes in the defined cod protection area, to the proportion of haddockto be taken under special permit arrangements and to the allocation of catches takenso far in the fishing year – will be beneficial to those who take haddock as a bycatchin fisheries directed at other species.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 4 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has requested a report from the Deer Commission for Scotland in respect of the mass cull of deer in Glenfeshie; whether any such report will consider whether the commission acted properly and legally at all times and, if so, what independent opinion will be sought to inform such a report.
Answer
Ministers have requested a reporton the conduct of the recent culls in Glenfeshie and in particular the role of theDeer Commission for Scotland (DCS). It will cover issues of legality, public safety,deer welfare and food hygiene. The report will be prepared by officials externalto DCS, drawing on veterinary, food safety and other expert advice. Officials metwith Scottish Gamekeepers Association (SGA) and DCS on 6 April to discuss the relevantissues.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 April 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 4 May 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Deer Commission for Scotland regard deer as vermin.
Answer
While there is no basis withinthe Deer (Scotland) Act 1996 for deer to be regarded vermin, any animal presentlocally in such high numbers as to impact materially on other legitimate interestsrequires to be effectively managed and controlled; as provided for in the act.
