- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 February 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 22 February 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will obtain a valuation of the land and buildings occupied by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) at Hope Terrace, Edinburgh; whether, should the SNH head office be relocated from Edinburgh, the capital receipt from the sale of the premises at Hope Terrace would be available (a) in whole or (b) in part for relocation costs, and how any partial contribution to relocation costs arising from any such capital receipt would be calculated.
Answer
In accordance with the general principles in undertaking a relocation review, Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) will consider issues such as costs, social issues, personnel issues, transport and environmental considerations. A valuation of Hope Terrace, Edinburgh will be obtained to ascertain the potential costs or benefits in relocating. Should the review recommend moving from Hope Terrace, capital receipts of up to £1 million would be available to SNH to cover relocation or other costs: capital receipts of more than £1 million would similarly be available with the consent of the Scottish ministers.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 February 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 22 February 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether any deadline has been fixed for the submission by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) of a report costing the options for relocating its headquarters from Edinburgh; which locations are being considered for such a relocation; whether SNH staff will have access to the full report prior to its final submission, and whether any parts of the report will not be disclosed and what the reasons are for the position on this matter.
Answer
It was announced on 19 November 2001 that Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) would undertake a relocation review, as there is a property lease break in one of its Edinburgh offices in 2005. The review will access issues such as costs, quality and efficiency of service, economic factors such as unemployment, availability and suitability of property and staff, transport and environmental issues. Staff and unions will be consulted before decisions are taken on the most suitable location for SNH staff. The target date for completion of the review is mid-2002 and ministers will take a decision on the most suitable HQ location for SNH based on the review findings.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 February 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 22 February 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will list any headquarters functions of Scottish Natural Heritage that are carried out (a) at Hope Terrace, Edinburgh, (b) at Bonnington Bond, Leith, (c) in Inverness, (d) in Aberdeen, (e) in Battleby and (f) in Clydebank.
Answer
Scottish Natural Heritage carries out a range of headquarters functions at its Hope Terrace, Bonnington, Battleby, Inverness, Aberdeen and Clydebank locations.The following table gives details of the HQ functions carried by out by one or more staff at each office location.
| Hope Terrace | Bonnington | Inverness | Aberdeen | Battleby | Clydebank |
Secretariat, Press and PR | | | | | | |
Corporate Planning and Information Unit | | | | | | |
Finance Services | | | | | | |
Personnel Services | | | | | | |
Information Systems Services | | | | | | |
Common Services | | | | | | |
Design & Information Services | | | | | | |
Audit and Review | | | | | | |
Operational Support Unit | | | | | | |
Advisory Services | | | | | | |
National Strategy | | | | | | |
Chief Scientists Unit | | | | | | |
Environmental Audit | | | | | | |
Natura 2000 | | | | | | |
Directors Support Units | | | | | | |
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 February 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 21 February 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-20422 by Nicol Stephen on 11 December 2001, whether it will take urgent action in order to bring forward the publication of the Review of Educational Psychologists; on what date the report will be published; whether it is impossible for the negotiating group representing educational psychologists to negotiate salary levels until this report has been made available to them; what its position is on the role and pay and conditions of educational psychologists compared with those of teachers, and what steps it will take in order to ensure that no discrimination against educational psychologists arises.
Answer
The Scottish Executive will publish the report of the Review of Educational Psychology Services by the end of February.The Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers (SNCT) is currently considering the issue of pay and conditions for educational psychologists.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 February 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 20 February 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the 10% reduction in the total allocated catch for nephrops in 2001 will be re-instated for 2002.
Answer
At last December's Fisheries Council, the commission proposed reductions in various Nephrops total allocated catch (TAC). In line with the scientific advice, the UK argued successfully for increases on these commission proposals. The outcome for 2002 was a Nephrops TAC in the North Sea restored to 2000 levels, and a Nephrops TAC West of Scotland restored to 2001 levels but lower than the TAC for 2000.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 05 February 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 19 February 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-13284 by Sarah Boyack on 23 March 2001, whether it or its agents now record the number of times on which powers under the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 are invoked.
Answer
The Scottish Executive does not record this information. However, the trunk road operating companies are required to maintain records of the times that they undertake delegated functions under the powers of the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 04 February 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 18 February 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will seek payment of agrimonetary compensation for the sheep sector; whether it will make representations to Her Majesty's Government that such compensation should be made available, and how much agrimonetary compensation is estimated to be available on application by Her Majesty's Government.
Answer
The European Commission have yet to confirm whether there is any agrimonetary compensation available to the sheep sector. Although this aid relates to the second and third stages of compensation paid last year, the EU agrimonetary rules provide for these later payments to be reduced or cancelled if the market prices and exchange rates have since moved in a direction which ameliorates the situation which led to the initial compensation. We will not know for some months what the commission assessment will be. When we do find out how much, if any, agrimonetary aid is available we will carefully consider the case for payment and make the appropriate representations to Her Majesty's Government.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 04 February 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 18 February 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many responses received to its consultation on the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill expressed an opinion relating to section 9(2)(a) of the bill and, of these, how many (a) supported and (b) opposed the inclusion of this provision in the bill.
Answer
The provision set out in section 9(2)(a) of the bill did not form part of the consultation draft of the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill. The decision to include section 9(2)(a) was taken in response to arguments advanced by 151 respondents to the consultation on the draft bill, who considered that access rights should not extend to commercial activities. There were four respondents who were in support of commercial activities being included in access rights.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 28 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 18 February 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has received any representations from the police in respect of any defective road surface on the A82 south of Inverarnon and, if so, when such representations were received.
Answer
No representations from the police have been received by the Scottish Executive concerning the condition of the road surface on the A82 south of Inverarnan.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 25 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 18 February 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Minister for Transport will attend a public meeting in Badenoch and Strathspey in order to explain why BEAR Scotland Ltd was appointed to be responsible for trunk road maintenance; whether it is satisfied with the performance of BEAR Scotland Ltd to date; what action it has taken to ensure that BEAR Scotland Ltd fulfils its contractual obligations, and whether the division of responsibility for trunk roads and non-trunk roads between BEAR Scotland Ltd and the relevant local authority is effective.
Answer
Scottish minister were obliged to follow EU procurement rules in appointing trunk road maintenance operator, and to avoid contracts on the basis of the most economically advantageous tenders, subject to bidders being able to demonstrate a proven track record in road management and maintenance.BEAR Scotland Ltd was appointed trunk road operating company for the North East and North West Units following the tender competition where BEAR was assessed as submitting the most economically advantageous tenders for both Units. Prior to tender invitation the companies who make up BEAR Scotland Ltd were able to demonstrate that they have a proven track record of providing road management and maintenance services, including winter maintenance.The Scottish Executive employs the Performance Audit Group (PAG) to audit and monitor the activities and performance of BEAR to ensure the standards required by the trunk road contract are achieved. To date there is no evidence to suggest that the level of service has dropped since BEAR took over the contract. The current trunk road maintenance contracts specify the same level of service as in previous years. The level of service provided on non-trunk roads is a matter for the relevant local authorities. I have received no invitation to attend a public meeting as described, nor do I have any plans to do so.