Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 22 July 2024
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 3059 questions Show Answers

|

Question reference: S2W-21837

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how SQW Economic Development Consultants measured coverage of Scotland as a result of the 2005 G8 summit being held in Gleneagles as being either neutral, positive or negative in tone, as set out in the report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles.

Question reference: S2W-21844

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, with reference to the use of advertising value equivalence by SQW Economic Development Consultants in their report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles, how readily it considers articles in the media about the 2005 G8 Summit being hosted in Gleneagles can be equated with adverts showcasing Scotland as either a tourist destination or as a destination for inward investment.

Question reference: S2W-21839

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive whether, when SQW Economic Development Consultants state in their report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles, that “estimating the wider costs of disruption is beyond the scope of this work”, they were precluded from carrying out an analysis of the cost implications of disruption caused by the summit and costs of repairing damage to civic and private property caused by those in Scotland protesting at the presence of the summit.

Question reference: S2W-21836

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what methodology was used by SQW Economic Development Consultants to back their statement that the total value of coverage for Scotland as a result of the 2005 G8 Summit having been held in Gleneagles in the lead-up to the summit over six months was £618 million, as asserted in the report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles.

Question reference: S2W-21840

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive whether, when SQW Economic Development Consultants state in their report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles, that “the G8 has a particularly high profile in Scotland’s main tourism markets”, they have treated any coverage of the 2005 G8 Summit in these places as being automatically beneficial for the tourist industry.

Question reference: S2W-21843

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what the effect would be of the 2005 G8 Summit being held in Gleneagles in terms of the expenditure accrued by it, as opposed to the revenue accrued to the Scottish economy by the summit, if the revenue raised by the Make Poverty History march and Live 8 event were not included in the estimate made by SQW Economic Development Consultants in their report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles.

Question reference: S2W-21845

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how SQW Economic Development Consultants estimated that 37% of those taking part in the Make Poverty History march and 39% of those attending the Live 8 event were from outside Scotland, as set out in their report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles.

Question reference: S2W-21830

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what the detailed methodology used by SQW Economic Development Consultants was in their investigation of the economic impact of hosting the 2005 G8 summit at Gleneagles by which they measured the advertising value equivalent of the “unprecedented media coverage” of Scotland between 2 and 11 July 2005 as a result of the G8 summit as being worth £66.4 million.

Question reference: S2W-21834

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive whether, in its estimate that the Scottish economy benefited by Gleneagles having hosted the 2005 G8 Summit, it has accounted for the costs to repair damage to civic and private property by those protesting at the presence of the summit.

Question reference: S2W-21842

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2005
  • Current Status: Answered by Tom McCabe on 24 January 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, where SQW Economic Development Consultants identify increased costs in a number of cases caused by damages to property in their report, Economic Impact of Hosting the 2005 G8 Summit at Gleneagles, whether these costs have been included in the estimate within that report of the costs and benefits to the Scottish economy by virtue of this summit.