Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 22 July 2024
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 3059 questions Show Answers

|

Question reference: S2W-22276

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will resolve the issue identified by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 11.1 of his inspection report of March 2005 on HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont that children under the age of 16 are being held in that institution “as a result of their being deemed by Secure Units as too difficult to be held”, despite his earlier recommendation of May 2004 that children aged under 16 should not be held in a prison.

Question reference: S2W-22287

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive why the reasons for not allowing individuals in Iona Hall at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont have not been examined, as recommended by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 2.35 of his May 2004 inspection report but identified in paragraph 12.12 of his March 2005 report as “not achieved”.

Question reference: S2W-22285

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what action it has taken to improve conditions in Argyll Hall at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont, as recommended by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 2.5 of his inspection report of May 2004 but assessed as “not achieved” in his report of March 2005.

Question reference: S2W-22274

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will ensure that children under the age of 16 are not held in prison, as recommended by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 8.45 of his inspection report of May 2004 on HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont.

Question reference: S2W-22278

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will set out the procedures for infection control and monitoring in both Argyll and Spey Halls at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont, referred to by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraphs 11.2 and 11.3 of his inspection report of March 2005.

Question reference: S2W-22280

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will improve the situation in Dunedin Hall at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont which was identified by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 11.4 of his inspection report of March 2005 as having seen “little improvement in what is a very limited regime”.

Question reference: S2W-22279

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will improve conditions in Dunedin Hall at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont which were described as “basic” by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 11.4 of his inspection report of March 2005.

Question reference: S2W-22283

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will address the situation in HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont identified by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraphs 11.8 and 12.1 of his inspection report of March 2005 as having insufficient work places for the convicted population.

Question reference: S2W-22281

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will improve the reliability of the emergency cell intercom system in Iona Hall at HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont which was identified as being “problematic” by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 11.5 of his inspection report of March 2005.

Question reference: S2W-22289

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 13 January 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 1 February 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how it will address the situation in HM Young Offenders Institute Polmont, identified by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons in paragraph 12.38 of his inspection report of March 2005, that accommodation used for educational programmes “is still insufficient”.