- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the Lord Advocate’s oral evidence to the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006, whether the Lord Advocate will provide further explanation of what he meant when he told the Justice 1 Committee that the advocate depute “also formed a view on the basis of the information that he had about Mr Wertheim and took the right decision to continue the case” (Official Report, c. 3709) and whether the Lord Advocate will now publish the information to which he was referring.
Answer
As I made clear when I gave evidenceto the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006, when the Advocate Depute becameaware of the evidence to be led by the defence from Mr Wertheim and Mr Grieve, hecarefully assessed this, along with the evidence available from the ScottishCriminal Record Office experts. He took the decision to proceed with the trial,and I believe that he made the right decision at that time.
I do not intend to provide anyfurther comment or information in relation to this matter – the assessment of theevidence which required to be carried out at that time was a matter for the professionalassessment of the Advocate Depute, in whom I have great confidence.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the Lord Advocate’s oral evidence to the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006, whether the Lord Advocate will issue a full explanation of what he meant when he told the Justice 1 Committee that “the evidence that was given was not in accordance with what the advocate deputy’s understanding of it was” (Official Report, c. 3705).
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-28528 on 28 September 2006. All answers to written parliamentaryquestions are available on the Parliaments website, the search facility for whichcan be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the Lord Advocate’s oral evidence to the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006 (Official Report, c. 3688), which ministers and officials (a) were provided with a copy of the MacKay report into the Scottish Criminal Record Office’s handling of the Shirley McKie and (b) had acess to it.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-23304 on 21 March 2006. All answers to writtenparliamentary questions are available on the Parliaments website, the search facilityfor which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the Lord Advocate's oral evidence to the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006 (Official Report, c. 3688), whether the Lord Advocate can now confirm how and when he first became involved in the Shirley McKie case.
Answer
As I told the Justice 1 Committeeon 12 September 2006, I became involved in the Shirley McKie case when thematter was reported to me in relation to the allegation of perjury against her.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the Lord Advocate’s oral evidence to the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006 (Official Report, c. 3688), what action has been taken by the (a) police and (b) Crown Office to investigate the validity of the report in a national newspaper that a Mr Docherty has allegedly confessed to the murder of Marion Ross.
Answer
It is not appropriate to disclosedetails of a criminal investigation, particularly in relation to a specific personor persons, for operational reasons.
As I made clear in my evidenceto the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006, officially the murder of Marion Rossis unsolved and the police do not have any new lines of inquiry at this stage. However,any new lines of inquiry will, where appropriate, be pursued.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the Lord Advocate’s oral evidence to the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006 (Official Report, c. 3688), at what point prior to or during Shirley McKie’s trial for perjury the Crown Office became aware that there was (a) a professional challenge to the Scottish Criminal Record Office’s identification of a fingerprint in Marion Ross’s house as that of Shirley McKie and (b) other evidence to show that Ms McKie could not have been in the house when the Crown Office alleged she had been.
Answer
The Crown were made aware ata very late stage, just prior to the commencement of the Shirley McKie trial, thatthe defence intended to lead fingerprint evidence challenging the identificationof Y7 by SCRO. No such evidence was available at the time the case was indicted.
In relation to the other evidence,I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-28528 on 28 September 2006. Allanswers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliaments website,the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the Lord Advocate’s oral evidence to the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006 (Official Report, c. 3688), what the total cost was of commissioning, preparing and issuing the MacKay report into the Scottish Criminal Record Office’s handling of the Shirley McKie case.
Answer
I refer the member to theanswers to questions S2W-23970 and S2W-25241 on 3 April 2006 and 8 June 20006respectively. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliaments website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.The Crown Office andProcurator Fiscal Service does not hold the information requested.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the Lord Advocate’s oral evidence to the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006 (Official Report, c. 3688), in how many cases in each of the last 10 years the Crown Office has requested or instructed the police service to investigate or carry out further investigations into an unsolved crime and what the outcomes were of these investigations.
Answer
This information is unavailable,as there is no central record held of such cases.
In any event, it would not beappropriate, for operational reasons, to disclose information about criminal investigationsinto unsolved crimes.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the Lord Advocate’s oral evidence to the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006 (Official Report, c. 3688), whether, at any stage in the police inquiry or the Crown Office’s precognition prior to the Lord Advocate’s decision to prosecute Shirley McKie for perjury, there had been any denial that five officers had entered, but had not been logged as entering, Marion Ross’s house in Kilmarnock at the time it was a scene of crime.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-28528 on 28 September 2006. All answers to writtenparliamentary questions are available on the Parliaments website, the search facilityfor which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Colin Boyd on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the Lord Advocate’s oral evidence to the Justice 1 Committee on 12 September 2006 (Official Report, c. 3688), whether there were two sources of credible and reliable evidence to establish each of the essential facts in relation to the allegation of perjury by Shirley McKie prior to the Lord Advocate taking the decision to prosecute her.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-28528 on 28 September 2006. All answers to writtenparliamentary questions are available on the Parliaments website, the search facilityfor which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.