- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 23 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it can compel Scottish-based fishing quota owners to join the proposed quota management and licensing system.
Answer
The proposals are for a Scottish quota management and licensing system which will apply to Scottish vessels and quota holders as defined in the consultation document Safeguarding Our Fishing Rights: The Future of Quota Management and Licensing in Scotland - Interim outcome of consultation report.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 23 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it can compel Scottish-based fishing boats to join the proposed fishing quota management and licensing system.
Answer
The proposals are for a Scottish quota management and licensing system which will apply to Scottish vessels and quota holders as defined in the consultation document Safeguarding Our Fishing Rights: The Future of Quota Management and Licensing in Scotland - Interim outcome of consultation report.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 13 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-19223 by Stewart Maxwell on 21 January 2009, whether the fact that no properties were built by the Devanha consortium in 2005-06 and 2006-07 resulted in an underspend in the Grampian region’s housing programme budget allocation and, if so, to where the surplus was relocated.
Answer
The Devanha Grant Offer was approved in March 2007, and so there were no properties built by the Devanha Consortium in 2005-06 or 2006-07. There was therefore no associated underspend.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 13 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether an analysis of the Devanha consortium was completed in 2008.
Answer
Heriot-Watt University and DTZ were commissioned by the Scottish Government to carry out a monitoring and evaluation study of Devanha to run over the three year period of the programme. It draws on evidence collected through the monitoring and evaluation framework developed by the consultants through discussion with Scottish Government and Devanha partners and stakeholders. Key documents guiding the analysis have been the Offer of Grant from Scottish Ministers to Devanha Limited and the Programme Agreement between the Scottish Government and Devanha Limited. The evaluation will likely lead to a final published report, expected to be in 2011.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 13 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will provide the names of consultants it contracted when setting up the (a) Devanha consortium and (b) Highland Housing Alliance consortium and a breakdown of the amounts paid to the consultants.
Answer
The Scottish Government did not contract with any consultants to establish Devanha Ltd. However, Devanha Ltd engaged the support of the Collaborative Working Centre (CWC) to provide guidance and support on the open-book procurement process.
Brian Burns Associates were contracted to assist in the setting up of the Highland Housing Alliance. On 19 October 2004, Communities Scotland contributed £6,148.75 towards engaging Brian Burns Associates to advise and prepare proposals for the Alliance on structural and operational topics. A further contribution of £14,000 was made on 24 March 2005 towards business planning support.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 05 March 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 13 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will provide details of all costing benchmarks that were agreed with the Devanha consortium during the tendering processes for new housing developments and the extent to which the targets were met.
Answer
The Devanha grant offer set a three person equivalent cost benchmark of £67,248, base dated March 2007. All projects agreed with the Devanha Consortium are assessed against this benchmark.
The Devanha Consortium is operating an open-book contracting process, therefore the final costs of delivery against targets will not be confirmed until the total programme completes.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 26 February 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 12 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, in order to inform responses to the consultation, Investing in Affordable Housing: A Consultation, whether it will clarify how it plans to ensure that the proposed lead developers will secure private funding and develop efficient cash flows for developments in cases where their consortia intend to transfer the relevant property units to another registered social landlord.
Answer
In the consultation Investing in Affordable Housing: A Consultation the Government has proposed developing guidance to support associations when setting up consortia and lead developer arrangements. This proposed guidance is intended to address questions such as the raising of private finance and efficient cash flows in cases when one association builds homes that are then owned and managed by another association. The full scope of the proposed guidance, and decisions about the reform proposals as a whole, will be considered by the government in light of the consultation responses.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 26 February 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 12 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, in order to inform responses to the consultation, Investing in Affordable Housing: A Consultation, whether it will fully explain the basis on which it is assumed that lead developers will be better equipped than small rural housing associations in terms of identification of land and skills for new developments.
Answer
The consultation
Investing in Affordable Housing: A Consultation sets out the current proposal that; Lead developers will be established good performers and exemplars of good practice in procurement and investment. They will have strong connections and relationships with local authorities and other major stakeholders. Appointment as a lead developer would offer RSLs opportunities for increased control over the planning and management of investment and for developing stronger relations with central and local government, as well as with contractors, developers and other private sector partners. And lead developers will further develop good practice in investment and procurement, acting as beacons for further improvement for the benefit of the sector as a whole.(paragraph 35).
When working with a lead developer there will continue to be an important role for small rural housing associations in terms of identification of land and skills for new developments. The position of associations and their role when working with a Lead Developer should be safeguarded by putting in place a formal agreement. The government has proposed developing guidance to support associations when setting up consortia and lead developer arrangements and putting a formal agreement in place. It is also proposed that associations can continue to develop without working with a lead developer if they satisfy the proposed pre-qualification criteria, which would be another route for small rural associations.
The scope of the proposed guidance, and decisions about the reform proposals as a whole, will be considered by the government in light of the consultation responses.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 26 February 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 11 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive, in order to inform responses to the consultation, Investing in Affordable Housing: A Consultation, how it plans to ensure that the proposed concentration and streamlining of development and procurement under the lead development system would safeguard local expertise that is currently harnessed directly by smaller rural housing associations.
Answer
The government''s current proposals are that associations set up development consortia and that this should be governed by a formal agreement. On page 25 of the consultation paper Investing in Affordable Housing: A Consultation it says; Consortium heads [or Lead Developers] will agree with the other consortium members what the nature of their contribution will be, how relations within the consortium will work and which organisation will eventually pay for, own and manage the new homes. They will also agree how to manage contracting and procurement in order to secure the most value from the process, and how completion and transfer of the new homes to the eventual owners and managers will work. Even when working with a Lead Developer there would still be a continuing role for smaller rural housing associations and the important contribution that their local expertise makes to development and procurement can be recognised and protected. It is also proposed to retain flexibility in funding arrangements and that associations could bid for funding without working with a Lead Developer, if they are pre-qualified. This could be another route through which smaller rural associations could continue to develop. We will look at responses to the consultation on this as well as all other points.
- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 February 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Adam Ingram on 11 March 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it considers that section 50 of the Children Act 1975 has been successfully implemented.
Answer
It is a matter for each local authority to ensure that the discretionary powers available to it under section 50 of the Children Act 1975 are used effectively and in accordance with both its statutory duties and also its local policies and priorities.