- Asked by: Mary Scanlon, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen McLeod on 7 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government how it ensures that the use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture does not impact on (a) human health, (b) the environment and (c) wild salmon and trout.
Answer
The risk that any veterinary medicine might pose to human health or the environment is considered by the Veterinary Medicines Directorate during the authorisation process for new medicines. A product will not gain a marketing authorisation under veterinary medicines legislation unless it is considered safe, efficacious and of high quality. A significant component of the safety assessment includes the potential for a medicine to impact upon human health and the environment including non-target animals such as wild salmon and trout. If there is a risk that cannot be mitigated or controlled then a medicine will not be authorised.
In addition to this assessment, The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) includes conditions relating to antibiotic use in the site specific licences and associated documentation issued to fish farm operators under the Water Environment (Controlled Activities) (Scotland) Regulations 2011. It should be noted however that over the last decade, since the advent of vaccination of most farmed salmon, antibiotic use in fish farming has been generally at a low level. A mean of 9 marine cage fish farm sites report using antibiotic products to SEPA in any given year since records began to be compiled in 2002. In any given year there are typically approximately 250 active marine cage fish farm sites in use in Scotland, thus on average perhaps 3.6% of marine cage fish farms have reported antibiotic use in any given year.
- Asked by: Mary Scanlon, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen McLeod on 7 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government whether (a) emamectin benzoate and (b) hydrogen peroxide is used in fish farms and, if so, how it ensures that its use does not impact on (i) human health, (ii) the environment and (iii) wild salmon and trout.
Answer
Both emamectin benzoate and hydrogen peroxide are used on fish farms. The risk that any veterinary medicine might pose to human health or the environment is considered by the Veterinary Medicines Directorate during the authorisation process for new medicines. A product will not gain a marketing authorisation under veterinary medicines legislation unless it is considered safe, efficacious and of high quality. A significant component of the safety assessment includes the potential for a medicine to impact upon human health and the environment including non-target animals including wild salmon and trout. If there is a risk that cannot be mitigated or controlled then a medicine will not be authorised.
In addition to this assessment, The Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) includes conditions relating to the use of emamectin benzoate in the site specific licences and associated documentation issued to fish farm operators under the Water Environment (Controlled Activities) (Scotland) Regulations 2011. It is recognised that unrestricted use of emamectin benzoate may pose a risk to marine life and in particular crustaceans in the vicinity of fish farms. SEPA has therefore developed a sophisticated licensing system based on a predictive computer model to set site specific limiting conditions in marine cage fish farm authorisations. These conditions restrict the scale of the use and subsequent re-use of emamectin benzoate to ensure environmental protection. The controls put in place are designed to protect the most vulnerable aquatic animals for which emamectin benzoate is most toxic. The substance displays much lower toxicity to fish and thus in protecting more sensitive animals, the protection of salmon and trout and any other species in the water environment is assured.
Hydrogen peroxide poses a substantially lower environmental risk because the substance rapidly dissociates to water and oxygen, in particular in contact with organic matter. SEPA considers that the substance poses no significant risk to the environment out with the immediate vicinity of the fish farm cages.
- Asked by: Mary Scanlon, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen McLeod on 7 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government how it protects wild salmon and trout from lice.
Answer
Sea lice are marine parasites that occur naturally on many different species of wild fish including wild Atlantic salmon and sea trout. Marine Scotland’s Fish Health Inspectorate monitors sea lice on fish farms through a programme of sea lice inspections and enhanced sea lice inspections. A basic sea lice inspection is conducted whenever aquaculture facilities in seawater are visited, and an enhanced inspection is completed in cases where elevated lice numbers have been observed, reported or the site is considered to be at greater risk of elevated sea lice numbers.
- Asked by: Mary Scanlon, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen McLeod on 7 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government how many cases of chronic lice infestation on fish farms have been reported in each of the last 10 years.
Answer
Marine Scotland’s fish health inspectorate, monitor sea lice on fish farms through a programme of sea lice inspections and enhanced sea lice inspections. A basic sea lice inspection is conducted whenever aquaculture facilities in seawater are visited, an enhanced inspection is completed in cases where elevated lice numbers have been observed, reported or the site is considered to be at greater risk of elevated sea lice numbers. The number of inspections carried out is noted in the following table:
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 (to date) |
Basic Inspection | 24 | 250 | 188 | 122 | 90 | 106 | 86 | 52 |
Enhanced Inspection | 2 | 22 | 7 | 10 | 27 | 14 | 29 | 14 |
Prior to the enactment of the Aquaculture and Fisheries (Scotland) Act 2007, there were no inspections carried out solely for the purposes of monitoring sea lice populations, hence the absence of data prior to the latter part of 2008. Beyond this there is no requirement to report chronic sea lice infestations to the Scottish Government.
- Asked by: Mary Scanlon, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen McLeod on 7 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what action it takes to ensure that the rivers and lochs in the north west provide a healthy environment for wild salmon and trout.
Answer
The River basin management plans (RBMP) introduced in response to the EU Water Framework Directive, identifying water bodies that are at risk of failing to meet good ecological status or good ecological potential and prioritises them for improvement. Assessment of local fish assemblages including Atlantic salmon contributes to the overall ecological status of water bodies. Consequently, where local salmon populations are impacted by anthropogenic activity, this should trigger a downgrade of the waterbody status and subsequent management action through the RBMP process.
- Asked by: Mary Scanlon, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 19 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 6 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what development checks are carried out on children up to the age of five.
Answer
A development review is carried out at 27 to 30 months. There are opportunities to discuss development at the six to eight week health review and at the two months, three months, four months, 12 to 13 months and three to five years immunisation contacts. Vision screening takes place in the pre-school year, with the exception of one health board where it takes place in Primary One.
- Asked by: Mary Scanlon, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 19 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jamie Hepburn on 6 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what is being done to broaden the evidence base for psychological therapies in terms of early diagnosis and access to support to prevent mild and moderate depression becoming severe and chronic.
Answer
NHS Education for Scotland (NES) is supporting NHS boards to increase access to psychological intervention at an early stage in the patient journey by training a range of staff to deliver evidence-based low intensity psychological interventions. These are now widely available, and include cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based guided self-help and behavioural activation.
NES support training in CBT, which has been shown to reduce relapse rates in depression when compared to medication alone. NES also support training in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, which also reduces relapse rates in depression. These two high intensity interventions can, therefore, help prevent a chronic illness from developing.
- Asked by: Mary Scanlon, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 19 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maureen Watt on 6 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government how often children under five are screened for development in (a) verbal, (b) motor, (c) social and (d) other skills expected in this age range.
Answer
Health reviews are carried out within the first 24 hours and within the first 10 days of life. Motor, social and other skills development are reviewed at six to eight weeks; verbal, motor, social and other skills are reviewed at 27 to 30 months, and there are opportunities to discuss development in these skills at the immunisation contacts at two months, three months, four months, 12 to 13 months and three to five years. Vision screening takes place in the pre-school year, with the exception of one health board where it takes place in Primary One.
- Asked by: Mary Scanlon, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 19 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen McLeod on 1 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what funding it provides to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency to carry out site inspections following onshore energy developments.
Answer
Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) activities are funded through a combination of grant-in-aid support and charging to recover economic costs of its regulatory actions. These support SEPA’s delivery of its statutory obligations with regard to the delivery of the relevant regulatory requirements.
- Asked by: Mary Scanlon, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 19 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 25 June 2015
To ask the Scottish Government who is responsible for (a) monitoring and (b) enforcing planning conditions relating to onshore windfarm developments and hydro schemes and whether ring-fenced funding is provided for this purpose.
Answer
Planning authorities are responsible for (a) monitoring and (b) enforcing planning conditions relating to onshore windfarms and hydro schemes. It is for the landowner, unless otherwise specified, to ensure that the conditions of consent for development on their land are accorded with.
Funding is not ring-fenced for these purposes but comes from the general local government settlement.