To ask the Scottish Executive what the level of delayed discharge was for residents in the Argyll and Bute local authority area and what the target discharge rate was in each year since 1999.
The following table shows thenumbers of patients ready for discharge at April each year since the first Aprilcensus in 2001.
NHS – Patients ready for discharge– Argyll and Bute local authority area.
Total Number and Number OverSix Weeks for each End of Year Census Point: April 2001 to April 2006.
Census3 | Total1 | Over 6 Weeks2 | Target – Total Delays4 | Target – Over 6 Weeks |
April 2001 | 53 | 38 | - | - |
April 2002 | 62 | 52 | - | - |
April 2003 | 71 | 50 | - | - |
April 2004 | 47 | 33 | - | - |
April 2005 | 35 | 18 | 38 | 28 |
April 2006 | 63 | 44 | 30 | 22 |
Notes:
1. Total number of patients readyfor discharge, in all specialties, reported as at October 2006 census.
2. Number of patients ready fordischarge with a duration of over six weeks (43 days or more), i.e. the common periodfor discharge planning agreement timescales across Scotland.
3. The figures in the table excludepatients whose principal reason for delay at the census point was due to awaitingplace/bed availability in a specialist residential facility where no facilitiesexist, or due to requirements of the Adults with Incapacity Act. Prior to the April2003 census awaiting place or bed availability where no appropriate facilities existwere included under awaiting place or bed availability. Therefore cannot be takenout of the census totals prior to April 2003 census. Prior to the July 2004 censusAdults with Incapacity Act were included under legal issues. Therefore cannot betaken out of the census totals prior to July 2004 census.
4. It is not possible to supplytarget information for 2002-03 or 2003-04 as these were not percentage targets norbroken down by local authority areas.
The Delayed Discharge ActionPlan, published in March 2002, set a national target of a reduction of 1,000 indelayed discharges across Scotland, by April 2003. For April 2004, partnerships agreed targetswith the department, based on local circumstances. For 2004-05 and 2005-06, partnershipswere expected to achieve a 20% reduction across the board.
All of these targets were agreedat health board area level and are not broken down by local authority area.
Argyll and Bute did makesignificant reductions in delayed discharges in 2003-04 and again in 2004-05. However,their performance in 2005-06 has been poor and we have had significant engagementwith the council over recent months to secure improved performance.