Chamber and committees

Good morning. Clare Gallagher spoke about this briefly in answer to Karen Adam, but I wonder whether our witnesses have any other views on the way that ministers responded to the questions that the citizens panel developed. I am thinking, in particular, of the potential issues with mainstreaming. Perhaps Heather Williams could respond first.

Thank you. I do not know whether anyone wants to come back in on any of that.

I am fine with that, convener. Thanks very much, panel.

Good morning, panel. Jan, you mentioned in your opening remarks that there are still people out there who do not know who to contact about human rights issues. What is the reason for that? How can it be addressed?

For the reasons that everyone else has given, I am content. The group has cross-party support and Oliver articulated its purpose very well.

Good morning, minister and officials. Could you explain why the Scottish Government considers it necessary for solicitors and other regulated professionals to have at least a 10 per cent stake in alternative business structures?

Thanks for that. I have one more question, if you do not mind, convener. We have heard various views on whether regulating the title of lawyer could have unintended consequences. I would like to hear your view on that, minister.

Thanks for that.

How did you come up with 10 per cent?

Good morning, panel. I am trying to get to grips with the issue of the independent regulator. In response to the committee’s call for views, you put forward the argument that an independent regulator, as proposed by the Roberton review, would

“threaten ... the independence of the ... legal profession”

and the rule of law, as well as the role of the Lord President. Could you expand on that for us, please?