Chamber and committees

I am sorry, but we have to move on. I am just very conscious of the time. We have about 30 minutes left and still have quite a number of questions to ask.

We move on to our third theme, which is siting near migratory routes, with a question from Emma Harper.

The committee recently heard that there was evidence that sites are still being consented close to migratory routes, despite the policies in NPF4, and that district salmon fishery boards’ views are not given enough weight. Mark Harvey, given your experience, do you recognise those comments or concerns?

Thank you. We move to the next theme, which is enforcement.

Amendment 60, in the name of Rachael Hamilton, is grouped with amendments 63, 65, 66, 71, 73, 74 and 77.

The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.

Amendment 60 disagreed to.

Section 1—Ministers to make code of practice

Amendment 6, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 8, 17, 18, 29 to 31, 35 and 37.

Do any other members have anything to say on this group?

Thank you, Ms Grahame. Next is the minister, to wind up.

The question is, that amendment 12 be agreed to. Are we agreed?

Members: No.

There will be a division.

For

Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)
Beattie, Colin (Midlothian North and Musselburgh) (SNP)
Burgess, Ariane (Highlands and Islands) (Green)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Roddick, Emma (Highlands and Islands) (SNP)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)

Against

Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Hamilton, Rachael (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con)