Chamber and committees

What are the risks of including the conscientious objection section in the bill when implementing it might be beyond the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament?

My question is on conscientious objection. How clear a view do witnesses have of the roles and activities that are likely to be covered by the conscientious objection section as it is currently drafted? Does Dr Earle want to come in on that?

Thank you.

Good morning. My questions are around the Scott review and capacity decisions. Is the approach to capacity outlined in the bill, which is taken in large part from the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000, still fit for purpose in light of the recent review of the area?

Professor McKay mentioned that the recommendations from the Scott review are with the Scottish Government. Are there any that can improve the bill?

Can the witnesses provide an overview of the extent to which assistance with assisted dying is allowed by the laws in Victoria and the rest of Australia, and the form that such assistance can take?

Yes. If someone has a physical impairment that means that they cannot lift the glass to their mouth themselves, is someone allowed to help?

Professor White, do you have any comments?

Do you keep statistics on the proportion of those who seek assisted dying but have a physical impairment that would prevent them from self-administration?

My next question is also aimed at you, John. In 2023, NatureScot gave advice that there should be regular reviews by the Government and stakeholders on progress within national park partnership plans. How well do you think national parks are currently reviewing their progress or being externally scrutinised?