Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 27 November 2024
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 4051 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Elections Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2021

Edward Mountain

I have some quick questions for the minister. Does the Scottish Government believe that UK citizens who live abroad should be able to vote for more than 15 years?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Elections Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2021

Edward Mountain

Pardon?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Elections Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2021

Edward Mountain

Right—fine. Convener, I have had enough of—

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Elections Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2021

Edward Mountain

I cannot hear you.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Elections Bill

Meeting date: 25 November 2021

Edward Mountain

Okay. There are two things that I want to go back to, if I may. First, we know that holding different elections on the same day does not work. We have seen that, and I totally agree with you on that. I would be very surprised if anyone thought that it would be a good idea to run two different parliamentary elections on the same day. That just does not work.

Secondly, you said that we will not have voter ID in Scotland, which gives me a clear indication that you have decided what will be in your election bill. However, you could not answer a question that I asked earlier about what would be in the bill. You have decided to disclose some parts of it, but you cannot disclose other parts. Is that right?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Elections Bill

Meeting date: 18 November 2021

Edward Mountain

I have a question on proxy voting. There is a proposal to reduce the number of people for whom an individual person can be a proxy. In the past, I have been a proxy for all my children, and the bill would stop that. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? I am not asking whether the fact that I voted for my children, on their instructions, is a good or bad thing; I am asking whether the limit on proxies is a good or bad thing. The proposed limit of two would be quite minimal for a lot of families. I seek your opinion on that.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Elections Bill

Meeting date: 18 November 2021

Edward Mountain

No, but I was going to move on to proxy voting.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Elections Bill

Meeting date: 18 November 2021

Edward Mountain

Not on that, convener. I am wondering whether you will let me go on with my next question. I am not being impertinent—I am happy to move on.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Elections Bill

Meeting date: 18 November 2021

Edward Mountain

Sorry. I will be quiet until Louise Edwards has finished.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Elections Bill

Meeting date: 18 November 2021

Edward Mountain

I want to make the very point that Louise Edwards has made. It is very difficult to prove whether somebody has voted on somebody else’s behalf if no one in the polling station recognises that. The person could have cast their vote with a postal vote, then taken an electoral registration card down to the polling station, waved it at the presiding officer or poll clerk and been allowed to vote. It is really difficult to prove, as Louise Edwards has said—that is a fact. How do we have absolute confidence that the problem is not bigger than has already been suggested?