Chamber and committees

Katy Clark, did you want to come in on this topic?

In that case I will bring in Fulton MacGregor, who has been waiting patiently.

The next item is consideration of a Scottish statutory instrument. I refer members to paper 3. Do members have any comments to make, or are we content with the instrument?

What level of engagement has the Scottish Government had with the profession over the past three years?

I accept the points that you make, which are obviously shared by other members, so I am happy for us to pick up the issue offline and consider it more closely. It is a very valid issue to raise.

Thank you, Pauline. Those very valid points lead us to paper 2, which sets out in table form the recommendations that we identified as part of our work on the action plan. [Interruption.] Excuse me—I have to clear my throat. Please give me two seconds. [Interruption.]

On the basis of what we have discussed, we should move to paper 2. We have perhaps already covered some of the points that are relevant to it, but, as I have said, the paper sets out the recommendations that we made with regard to the action plan, the key issues that we identified and the progress that has been made on each this session. Obviously some of the issues are longer term, and some are shorter term. I hope that we can pick up some of what is discussed in the paper.

I do not want this to be a tedious process, but I propose that we go through the table section by section and members can make comments or raise concerns, particularly with regard to the assessments that have been included in the table and which the clerks have assisted with. I think that we would acknowledge that they are, to some degree, subjective, but I hope that this approach will allow us to monitor areas where progress is being made and areas where we might need to push harder from here on in.

Moving on to the table, which is in the annex to paper 2, I will take each of the specific areas in turn, starting with “The impact of Covid and recovery”. Do members have any points to make?

It is a complex part of the law and it is important that people understand the implications.

I assume that members agree that we should write to the SPS and ask for a prompt reply. I do not know whether members feel that it would be appropriate to set a timescale for that. Are members happy for us to do that?

Members indicated agreement.

I was not entirely sure what the status of throughcare was. I think that we all agreed that it was a priority. Again, I am conscious that we are at a relatively early stage—that is not at all making excuses.

On the three points that Jamie Greene raised, I am optimistic that updates are available—it is just that we have not received them. We need to press for them, and I am happy to do that.

Moving on to page 9, Jamie picked up on the estate issue. Would you like to come in, Rona?

Our next agenda item is consideration of five Scottish statutory instruments. I refer members to papers 3 to 5. For the record, I remind members that I am a former police officer with Grampian Police and Police Scotland.

Paper 3 relates to the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003 (Freezing Order) (EU Exit) (Scotland) Regulations 2022 (SSI 2022/95), on which we need to make three decisions. We need to decide whether we agree with the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee that the use of the negative procedure is appropriate and that the Scottish Government is correct to assess the instrument as being of low significance for the reason that it contains minor and technical changes and relates to continuity of law without making any change to policy. We also need to decide whether we have any further comments to make on the instrument.

Do members have any comments to make or are they content?