Chamber and committees

We will go in reverse order this time and start with Colin, then move on to Salena and Fiona.

Thank you, Colin. That is good insight.

That is helpful—thank you.

Emma Roddick will ask the next set of questions.

Thank you both, and thank you, Ms Roddick. It is interesting to note the further discussions that are going to be had between officials and between the Scottish and UK Governments, and the ministerial conversations that are still to be had. We, too, have extended an invitation to UK ministers, and we hope that they might be able to give evidence to us soon.

I appreciate everybody’s brevity thus far this morning. We have the opportunity for further questions. I note that Miles Briggs would like to come in and, if anybody else would like to speak, they should indicate to me that they would like to do so. We have a wee bit of latitude left.

Thank you—that is helpful.

My question for the group is about scrutiny. Section 2 of the bill is about the regulation powers that would be given to the Scottish Government to uprate the carers allowance supplement in the future. What is your view on how much scrutiny should be brought to bear on that? There was a mixture of evidence in the written submissions about whether there should be maximum scrutiny, involving the super-affirmative procedure, which would go to the Scottish Commission on Social Security, or whether there would need to be very little scrutiny and the negative procedure would suffice. What are your views on that?

I am happy to go to Colin Toal and then Fiona Collie and Salena Begley. We have a maximum of 10 minutes left for this evidence session, so please be as brief as possible.

Salena Begley can have the final word.

Thank you, Evelyn.