- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 14 March 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 10 April 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how the view expressed in paragraph 23 of its Policy Memorandum on the Education (Disability Strategies and Pupils' Records) (Scotland) Bill that the inclusion of accessibility strategies in the national priorities in education "would carry little weight" is reconciled with the view expressed in the letter of 16 May 2000 from the then Deputy Minister for Children and Education to the Secretary of the Gaelic School Planning Group that the inclusion of Gaelic in the priorities was probably the most significant achievement ever for Gaelic medium education.
Answer
The National Priorities in Education define the key outcomes we want from school education. The inclusion of any issue in the priorities requires ministers, local authorities and schools to address it in planning and delivering school education. The inclusion of Gaelic in the priorities is, accordingly, a significant achievement for the development of Gaelic-medium education.The focus on outcomes in the Improvement Framework, under the National Priorities, is intended to give authorities and schools considerable flexibility to determine locally how these outcomes are secured.The Policy Memorandum to the Education (Disability Strategies and Pupils' Records) (Scotland) Bill makes clear that to support the duties introduced in Part IV of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, requires specific legislative provisions which could not be secured through the inclusion of a single indicator in the performance measurement framework, under the National Priorities. In addition, the provisions of the Bill require to apply to all schools in the public and private sectors. The Improvement Framework applies only to publicly-funded schools. The memorandum in no way questions the value of the priorities, in setting the agenda for improvement in Scottish education.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 21 March 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 4 April 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will ensure that Shirley McKie is paid suitable and fair compensation for the damage to her reputation, career, life and health caused by the false evidence given in her trial regarding fingerprint identification and, given that the court case took place in 1999, whether it will ensure that such payment is paid without further delay.
Answer
We are presently considering a claim for damages submitted on Ms McKie's behalf by her legal representatives.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 21 March 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 4 April 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how the decision of the Scottish Criminal Records Office (SCRO) that no errors were made by SCRO officers in the Shirley McKie case can be reconciled with previous statements by the Deputy First Minister and Minister for Justice and the Lord Advocate on this matter.
Answer
The conclusion of the Independent Scrutiny Committee, which was set up to be independent of SCRO and Strathclyde Joint Police Board, was that there were no matters of misconduct or lack of capability in the work surrounding the fingerprint comparisons made by SCRO officers. The Scrutiny Committee accordingly recommended that no disciplinary action be taken against the four officers concerned.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 March 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 3 April 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what arrangements are being made to allow entry into the new Teacher Induction Scheme for those students who are undergoing teacher training in Scotland but whose fees paid are by non-Scottish agencies.
Answer
The eligibility criteria for the Teacher Induction Scheme has been developed to include all those students studying in Scotland who are in publicly funded places.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 March 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Wendy Alexander on 3 April 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what its response is to the report of the University Registrar's meeting held at Stirling University on 1 March 2002, which concluded that the Arts and Humanities Research Board (AHRB) is not able to "separately identify awards made to Scottish students. They do not collect information on nationality as part of the application process. Therefore it will not be possible to prove whether #1.4 million transferred from the Student Awards Agency for Scotland to the AHRB is ultimately spent on Scottish students" and whether the transfer of postgraduate studentships in the humanities from a Scottish to a UK agency represents an accountable use of taxpayer's money.
Answer
It is not normal practice for the Arts and Humanities Research Board (AHRB) or the Student Awards Agency for Scotland (SAAS) to record the nationality of postgraduate students, as nationality is not used as a criterion in determining eligibility for student support. Under the previous arrangements, whether or not a particular student fell to be dealt with by SAAS or the AHRB was determined by residency. The AHRB currently monitors and will continue to monitor the residency of postgraduate students. It will therefore remain possible to identify those students receiving awards from the AHRB who would previously have fallen within the remit of SAAS.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 13 March 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 3 April 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what its response is to press reports on 10 March 2002 that the Lord Lyon may pursue claims against schools whose badges have a heraldic content which has not been matriculated or registered with the Lord Lyon.
Answer
I understand that the Sunday Herald have accepted that their report of this matter was inaccurate and they agreed to publish a letter from the Court of the Lord Lyon in a subsequent edition. I understand, too, that the Lord Lyon has written to you to explain the background. I have no further comment to offer on matters which are for the independent Lyon Court to consider.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 March 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 3 April 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what changes to the new Teacher Induction Scheme are planned to remove the barrier to access to the scheme for students at Scottish institutions who are funded by English education authorities but who wish to teach in Scotland.
Answer
The eligibility criteria for the Teacher Induction Scheme has been developed to include all students studying in Scotland who are in publicly funded places.No barrier to access to the scheme exists for those students, studying at Scottish institutions, who are funded by English Education Authorities.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 18 March 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 2 April 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-22764 by Mr Jim Wallace on 19 February 2002, why the information given in the answer differs from that provided by South Lanarkshire Council in its planning application report, considered by the Local Area Committee on 12 March 2002.
Answer
Question S1W-22764 asked what new facilities would be available after renovation that were not available before. The answer given provided that information and also referred to other upgrading of the court. The South Lanarkshire Council's planning application report provides further information on the work being undertaken including facilities that are currently available but that are going to be upgraded. For example, the layout of the existing facilities is being altered to provide a more efficient use of space and to create secure routes for prisoners through the court building.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 18 March 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elaine Murray on 2 April 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how much the Scottish Arts Council spent on the recruitment of its new director; how this compares to the recruitment costs of similar posts in other non-departmental public bodies, and what guidelines there are on recruitment processes and costs in respect of senior officers in public bodies.
Answer
The amount spent on the recruitment of their new director is a question for the Scottish Arts Council themselves. Details on recruitment costs in other non-departmental public bodies are not held centrally. New guidance is being devised at present covering the Executive's sponsorship of non-departmental public bodies. This will include specific guidance on the appointment of Chief Executives and similar posts, and will emphasise the importance of value for money considerations in the recruitment process.
- Asked by: Michael Russell, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 March 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 2 April 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-23494 by Cathy Jamieson on 12 March 2002, whether any local authorities or other local agencies have plans to involve private companies or private finance in assisting those who are temporarily or permanently excluded from school and what its position is on the suitability of any such plans.
Answer
The Scottish Executive does not hold information regarding any plans by local authorities' to involve private companies or private finance in assisting those who are temporarily or permanently excluded from school. Funding allocated by the Scottish Executive to local authorities under the Alternatives to Exclusion Programme of the Excellence Fund is subject to certain conditions. This includes reporting to the Scottish Executive how the allocated funds have been spent. Local authorities have discretion in determining how best these funds should be spent, provided that they comply with the conditions attached to the funding programme.