- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 29 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 28 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking in response to the Audit Scotland report on Coatbridge College, which stated that senior staff received payments “that exceeded the terms of the college’s severance scheme".
Answer
The events outlined by the Audit Scotland report on Coatbridge College took place at a time when primary responsibility for severance lay with college boards. Since then, colleges have become subject to the Scottish Public Finance Manual and must comply with the process outlined around settlement and severance arrangements.
As a result, colleges are now required to seek prior approval from the Scottish Funding Council for both settlement and severance arrangements.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 29 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 28 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what the terms are of Coatbridge College’s severance scheme and how many times these have been exceeded.
Answer
This is a matter for the Scottish Funding Council. I have asked the Chief Executive of the Council to respond directly.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 29 June 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angela Constance on 28 July 2015
To ask the Scottish Government how much the reorganisation of colleges has cost to date.
Answer
The Scottish Funding Council advises that the cost of college mergers is around £55 million, most of which was associated with voluntary severance programmes. Final details of costs will be captured by the Scottish Funding Council’s forthcoming evaluations of each merger.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 May 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 3 June 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what its estimate is of the level of public subsidy required in each year of the 2016-24 contract for Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services.
Answer
Based on the latest projections for the existing contract, the Scottish Government is currently estimating annual public subsidy payments in the range of £110 million to £120 million (excluding inflation) for each year of the 2016-24 contract. The actual subsidy in each year of the contract will only be known following acceptance of the successful tenderer bid.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 May 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 3 June 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what level of dividend the operator of the 2016-24 Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services will be entitled to take in each year of the contract and whether the competitive procedure with negotiation governing this re-tendering includes discussions with bidders over dividend levels.
Answer
The mechanism used to determine the level of dividend for the successful operator will be included in the invitation to tender for the Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services. It will seek to balance exposure to risk and reward, with appropriate shared-gain provisions to incentivise the operator to run the services as efficiently and effectively as possible. The mechanism and the terms of the contract may form part of the tender negotiations leading up to the issue of the invitation to submit final tenders.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 April 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 12 May 2015
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will publish the timeline for the procurement of Gourock-Dunoon ferry services from 2017 and whether the contractor for these services will be procured using the competitive procedure with negotiation.
Answer
Information on the Gourock to Dunoon procurement timeline and the procurement procedure will be provided when the contract notice is published later in 2015.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 April 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 12 May 2015
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S4W-25227 by Derek Mackay on 24 April 2015, whether, under the competitive procedure with negotiations, pre-qualified bidders for the contract will be permitted to discuss the terms of the existing pension schemes for workers after the publication of the invitation to tender.
Answer
The terms of the existing pension scheme are a matter for the trustees, current employers and employees and their representatives and will not form part of negotiations during the tender process.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 April 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 12 May 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what progress it has made with trade unions representing workers on Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services (CHFS) on including existing (a) employment and (b) pension protections in the 2016-24 CHFS contract in the forthcoming invitation to tender documents.
Answer
A joint pensions working group involving officials from Transport Scotland and representatives from the STUC and ferry unions was set up to discuss employment and pension protections in December 2014. The group has met a further three times since December 2014 to discuss specific proposals in relation to pension and employment protections to be included in the Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services tender specification.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 April 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 12 May 2015
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the section of the minutes from the meeting of the board of Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd on 27 February 2015 in which Transport Scotland officials discussed the CalMac Pension scheme and the Merchant Navy Officers’ Pension Fund were redacted; whether it will now publish the redacted sections, and for what reason these items were on the agenda.
Answer
The redacted elements relate to the board's confidential consideration of the pension scheme as part of its normal business as an employer.
The minutes of the meeting are prepared by Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd (CMAL) who have no plans to publish the redacted sections at this time.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 April 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 12 May 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to ensure that pension protections for ferry workers are specified in the forthcoming invitation to tender for the 2016-24 Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services contract.
Answer
Scottish Ministers want to protect the CalMac pension scheme in the next Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services contract in line with their stated principles of fairness, affordability and sustainability for public sector pensions. A pensions working group, involving officials from Transport Scotland and representatives from the STUC and ferry unions was set up in December 2014 to discuss the best way to achieve this outcome.