- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 6 January 2016
To ask the Scottish Government how many times (a) ministers and (b) officials have met representatives of (i) Serco and (ii) Serco Caledonian Sleepers Limited from 1 May 2014.
Answer
Ministers met with representatives of Serco Group (in relation to Caledonian Sleeper operations) on:
23 March 2015, at the official launch of the franchise;
14 December 2015.
Ministers met with representatives of Serco Caledonian Sleepers Limited on:
23 March 2015, at the official launch of the franchise;
24 November 2015.
There have been numerous meetings between officials and representatives of both Serco Group and Serco Caledonian Sleepers Limited during mobilisation and operation of the franchise.
The franchise agreement specifies the schedule of meeting between officials and representatives of Serco Caledonian Sleepers Limited since the franchise commenced on 31 March 2015. The most prominent of these is the per-period (four weekly) franchise performance meeting. The purpose of this meeting and the nature of required supporting reports is described at schedule 11, paragraph 6 of the franchise agreement.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 6 January 2016
To ask the Scottish Government when ministers last met representatives of Serco Caledonian Sleepers Limited to discuss the company’s efforts since 4 December 2015 to avoid industrial action with the RMT and whether the issue of indemnity for revenue lost due to periods of industrial action was discussed.
Answer
Ministers have had no meetings with representatives of Serco Caledonian Sleepers Limited since 4 December 2015.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 6 January 2016
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with Serco Caledonian Sleepers Limited regarding the (a) condition of rolling stock, (b) safety of (i) passengers and (ii) workers and (c) reliability of (i) toilet facilities, (ii) the power supply and (iii) smoke alarms on these services.
Answer
The franchise agreement specifies the schedule of meetings between officials and representatives of Serco Caledonian Sleepers Limited. There is a per-period (four weekly) franchise performance meeting where safety and maintenance issues are discussed. The purpose of this meeting and the nature of required supporting reports is described at schedule 11, paragraph 6, and schedule 13.2 of the franchise agreement.
This requires the franchisee to provide reports noting: 1) Key reliability issues and improvement plans; 2) Franchisee's and vehicle owner's product audit reports, and 3) Accidents reported (staff and passengers). These are reported on a per-period basis, and discussed at the franchise performance meeting.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 December 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Derek Mackay on 6 January 2016
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will publish the redacted sections of schedule 8.1.4.12 of the Caledonian Sleeper Franchise Agreement.
Answer
No. This information is commercially sensitive.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 09 November 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 18 November 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what advice it provides to pregnant mothers regarding the possible side effects of using sodium valproate for treating epilepsy.
Answer
Within the UK, it is the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) who has responsibility for the safety of medicines. The Scottish Government received an update from the MHRA concerning the dangers of prescribing sodium valproate to women of child bearing age on 21 January 2015 and this was forwarded on to NHSScotland the same day.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 October 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 28 October 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether MSPs should be able to access private talks regarding an NHS service change or closure that take place between NHS boards and the Scottish Health Council.
Answer
NHS service change should be an open, transparent and inclusive process in which options are developed and discussed with the people and communities who are potentially affected. That engagement should be proportionate to the proposed service change, with major service changes subject to a wide-ranging public consultation where all reasonable steps are taken to take account of differences of view. Reaching a consensus view amongst stakeholders can frequently be difficult and the evidence finely balanced.
Responsibility for decision making and accountability rests with the boards and they have clear guidance to follow. They are supported in what can be a complex and often controversial process of informing and involving people by the Scottish Council, which also quality assures the process in cases of “major” change. This will be an on-going dialogue, which usually takes the form of emails, phone calls and meetings. Where patients, members of the public and MSPs have expressed views as part of the engagement process, these views should be taken into account by both the board and the Scottish Health Council. Notes of meetings and related papers can be accessed on request.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 October 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 27 October 2015
To ask the Scottish Government how many times in each year since 2005 the Scottish Health Council has (a) agreed and (b) not agreed that a proposal by an NHS board to (i) change and (ii) close a service constitutes a major service change.
Answer
Since the Scottish Government’s CEL 04 (2010) guidance on ‘Informing, Engaging and Consulting people in Developing Health and Community Care Services’ issued in February 2010 there have been six service changes confirmed as ‘major’ service changes by the Scottish Government.
The Scottish Health Council (SHC) agreed those changes constituted ‘major’ service change in four of the six instances; in the case of the other two, these were confirmed as ‘major’ service changes at an early stage by the Scottish Government and so a view from SHC was not required to inform the decision. In none of these instances did the SHC disagree when an NHS board proposed major service change.
Five out of the six major service changes undertaken involved elements of closure or transfer of services, with the sixth involving a new build facility with services transferring across.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 October 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 27 October 2015
To ask the Scottish Government what the budget is of the Scottish Health Council, and how much it spends annually on (a) staffing, (b) office and (c) other costs.
Answer
The Scottish Health Council budget for the current financial year is £2.3 million. Of that, £2.09 million relates to staff costs, the balance being for non-pay, office and other operational costs. The budget provides for the full range of Scottish Health Council activities supporting and monitoring the way NHS boards carry out their Patient Focus and Public Involvement responsibilities.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 July 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank Mulholland on 17 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government whether, in relation to the decision on whether to proceed with a case, it is normal practice for a procurator fiscal to correspond with the employer of a member of the public alleged to have committed a crime.
Answer
The procurator fiscal would not routinely correspond with a member of the public’s employer however much depends on the circumstances of the case and there may be situations where this will take place. For instance, the employer may be a victim or a witness and have a legitimate interest to request information from the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service which may give rise to correspondence being issued depending on any data protection issues that arise. The accused may be a regulated worker involved in working with children or other vulnerable groups and the allegations may raise concerns regarding the suitability of that person to be employed in such a situation. In such a situation it may be proportionate and necessary in the public interest to disclose information to the employer having taken into account the interests of the accused, the interests of justice and the protection of the interests of the public.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 July 2015
-
Current Status:
Answered by Frank Mulholland on 17 August 2015
To ask the Scottish Government, when criminal behaviour is reported to a procurator fiscal, who the fiscal's office would correspond with regarding an alleged crime committed by a (a) member of the public, (b) police officer on duty and (c) police officer off duty.
Answer
In relation to reports alleging criminal behaviour by a member of the public or an off duty police officer the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service endeavours to respond to all correspondence it receives within 20 working days and will generally correspond with any individuals or organisations who have a legitimate interest on a case by case basis and in accordance with data protection principles and constraints. However, where the allegation involves a police officer on duty the fiscal’s office would also normally correspond with the Professional Standards Department of Police Scotland and may, in certain circumstances, correspond with the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner.